- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Date: 2003年12月30日 13:25:42 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <p06020403bc179d555d78@[129.46.227.161]>
>ever, looking at <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt>, section 2.11: > > Updates > > Specifies an earlier document whose contents are modified or > augmented by the new document. The new document cannot be > used alone, it can only be used in conjunction with the > earlier document. > >So maybe we need to leave it as is... > Why doesn't "augmented" cover this case? My reading of the text above is that "it can only be used in conjunction with the earlier document" _for_the_ areas_of_overlap. That is, you can update RFC XXXX and still have material that is stand alone that is not overlapping with RFC XXXX. Ted
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 16:26:43 UTC