- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: 2003年12月30日 21:38:31 +0100
- To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Cc: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3FF1E247.8020207@gmx.de>
Ted Hardie wrote: > In general, I don't see much of a problem with indicating that a spec > like this "updates" a previous document even if the document doesn't > change specific items in the previous document. Speaking personally, > when I see "updates", I take it as "read both". The contrast is, obviously, > with "supersedes" which implies one can/should read only the second > document. > > Just my take on it, > regards, > Ted Hardie And "read both" is what I'd really like to express. Geoff? -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 15:39:27 UTC