- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:07:36 -0500
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <E4F2D33B98DF7E4880884B9F0E6FDEE201DA0346@SUS-MA1IT01>
I also agree. I'll make this change and mark the issue as closed, unless someone objects. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:59 AM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: BIND issue: 4_SPECIAL OVERWRITE_STATUS Hi, back in October, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Maybe it would be more appropriate to reuse the response codes as > defined for MOVE in RFC 2518: > > 201: newly created > 204: replaced existing resource >etc. I agree. MOVE should be identical to BIND/DELETE, and therefore consistency with MOVE response codes seems to make sense. Proposal: Add the sentence: "In case of success, the server SHOULD return 201 (Created) when a new binding was created and 204 (No Content) when an existing binding was replaced". Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 21:08:07 UTC