- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: 2002年1月15日 12:30:37 -0500
- To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8AEA9@SUS-MA1IT01>
It probably makes sense to include both, i.e. "better support for pipelining" and "transactions" I personally am more optimistic that we can agree on an interoperable way of improving pipelining than that we can agree on an interoperable way of doing transactions. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Brotsky [mailto:dbrotsky@adobe.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:46 PM To: Jim Whitehead Cc: WebDAV Subject: RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? At 9:57 AM -0800 1/9/02, Jim Whitehead wrote: > > That said, it's still not clear batch methods are so necessary they'd >> preempt other work we've got to do. > >I agree that other work, especially the revision of RFC 2518, has higher >priority than this. But, since we'll be revising our charter soon, I was >mostly interested to see if it should be added as a charter to-do item. > >- Jim I would say "yes" if you phrase it in terms of general transactionality, not batch operations in particular. dan -- Daniel Brotsky, Adobe Systems tel 408-536-4150, pager 877-704-4062 2-way pager email: <mailto:page-dbrotsky@adobe.com>
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 12:31:39 UTC