- From: John Stracke <francis@appoint.net>
- Date: 1999年2月22日 15:10:54 +0000
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <36D1737E.68EF5580@appoint.net>
Imran Khan wrote: > Can't I do "besteffort" vs. "atomic" in case of PROPPATCH? Because in > my application scenario I am trying to replace the current protocol > that allows besteffort as well as atomic flexibility. If the client wants best-effort semantics, it can make multiple requests. -- /==============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own |S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@appoint.net|==========================================| |Chief Scientist |NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed| |Appoint.Net, Inc. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch| \==============================================================/
Received on Monday, 22 February 1999 10:09:42 UTC