- From: John Stracke <francis@netscape.com>
- Date: 1999年1月12日 15:56:13 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <369BE11C.9DC47B4D@netscape.com>
Larry Masinter wrote: > If support for structured documents is needed for interoperable > clients, then it should only be "optional" in the sense of another > set of collective features which form yet another standard for > which 'conformance implies interoperability'. Do we really want to invent our own structured documents model? Rhetorical question: what's wrong with multipart/related? -- /====================================================================\ |John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported | |Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================| |Netscape Comm. Corp. | You! Out of the gene pool! | |francis@netscape.com | | \====================================================================/
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 1999 18:56:15 UTC