RE: structured documents [draft-hopmann-collection-props-00.txt] from Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) (Exchange) on 1999年01月12日 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from January to March 1999)

From: Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) (Exchange) <lisal@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: 1999年1月12日 14:30:07 -0800
To: "'James.Anderson@mecomnet.de'" <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>, WEBDAV?WG? <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BFF90FB6CF66D111BF4F0000F840DB8506062483@LASSIE>

In the collection properties draft, both "folders" and "structured
documents" are types of collection. They differ in how they are intended to
be displayed.
Lisa
-----Original Message-----
From: james anderson [mailto:James.Anderson@mecomnet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 11:38 AM
To: WEBDAVWG
Subject: Re: structured documents
[draft-hopmann-collection-props-00.txt]
yes, i meant a "class hierarchy".
John Stracke wrote:
> 
> Jim Whitehead wrote:
> 
> > > for
> > > instance, is the intended hierarchy
> > > collection
> > > structured-document
> > > directory
> > > or is it
> > > collection
> > > structured-document
> > > directory
> > > ?
> >
> > I don't follow this, since my understanding of what is meant by
structured
> > document in the WebDAV sense isn't covered by these two cases.
> 
> I think he means class heirarchy, not namespace heirarchy. My sense is
that
> the latter form is the correct class heirarchy.

Received on Tuesday, 12 January 1999 17:30:09 UTC