- From: Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) (Exchange) <lisal@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: 1999年1月11日 13:23:16 -0800
- To: "'John Stracke'" <francis@netscape.com>
- Cc: "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BFF90FB6CF66D111BF4F0000F840DB8506062460@LASSIE>
I just noticed the possibility for infinite loops today. That would be fixed by requiring the "defaultdocument" property to point to a member of the collection. Perhaps we should also say that "defaultdocument" cannot point to a collection, which could in turn point somewhere else... Lisa -----Original Message----- From: John Stracke [mailto:francis@netscape.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 1999 1:13 PM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hopmann-collection-props-00.txt "Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) (Exchange)" wrote: > Three: Two new features in this draft that work together are the > "defaultdocument" property I kind of like defaultdocument, but I think it might need to be a list. Most existing servers have a rule for picking out the default document (e.g., "index.html, then index.cgi, then index.txt"); it would be a Good Thing if, on directories with no default set, they could expose the rule rather than just the document that they would currently serve up. (I'm not sure whether there's a need to be able to *set* an individual collection's defaultdocument to a list, but it could be useful, e.g., if a server decides that defaultdocument should be inherited by subcollections.) Also, one oversight (probably): the current Draft does not require that defaultdocument point to a member of the collection; as it stands now, it would be possible for it to point to a completely separate server. This might be a cute trick occasionally, but I think it'd be cleaner to create a referential member and make that the default. Oh, and the Draft does not specify what "the default document for a collection" means. We all know that it's the resource that gets referenced by a GET or HEAD on the collection URI; but that should be specified. -- /====================================================================\ |John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported | |Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================| |Netscape Comm. Corp. |Q: What goes "Pieces of 7! Pieces of 7!"?| |francis@netscape.com |A: A parroty error!! | \====================================================================/
Received on Monday, 11 January 1999 16:27:40 UTC