- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 14:08:18 -0700
- To: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Cc: WEBDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000301beb1f3085ドルe0020$d115c380@ics.uci.edu>
>The updated Draft is attached; if I don't hear any further comments, I'll >submit it to the IETF later this afternoon. Looks good to me -- submit! Since this document is pretty heavily based on [DC-RDF] http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/resources/dc/datamodel/WD-dc-rdf/, do you have any idea on how this document is going to progress? For example, if your I-D were to be submitted as anything other than Informational, [DC-RDF] would need to be a stable reference (e.g., a W3C Rec, or an IETF Proposed Standard). Even if you only want to go to Informational, how stable is [DC-RDF]? - Jim
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 1999 17:16:23 UTC