- From: <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 14:04:24 -0400
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <85256764.00637908.00@D51MTA07.pok.ibm.com>
> But the inverse does not hold, namely, the fact that the server maps > two URL's to the same resource doesn *not* imply that this resource > must be an internal member of an advanced collection, *nor* does it > imply that there must be two bindings to that resource. For example, > if the server maps http://host/todays-weather.html to the same > resource as http://host/5-1-1999-weather.html, this does not imply > that http://host is an advanced collection, nor that there are two > bindings to this resource. G, this paragraph leaves me scratching my head a bit. I can't deny that what you've just said is true, but an example in the proposal (if it can be kept short) would be valuable. Just something to remind us when/why this can be said. The item that makes me scratch my head the most is the comment about http://host not being an advanced collection. If I can associate that with a concrete example, it would be better integrated in my understanding.
Received on Saturday, 1 May 1999 14:06:49 UTC