- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: 1999年4月13日 18:40:35 +0000
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <37138FA3.F77FB816@ecal.com>
Jim Davis wrote: > Does this also create a binding for X/R.html to R? I think it has to--X is supposed to be indistinguishable from A, after all. (If X/R.html didn't exist, then what would be the point of creating X?) > If Yes, does this impose an unreasonable storage burden on the server? I don't think so. It may have some performance penalties (having to dereference the bindings for each parent collection), but i's a tradeoff. People who don't like the performance don't have to use bindings. -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal Corp. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 1999 14:38:11 UTC