- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: 1999年4月12日 17:27:20 +0000
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <37122CF8.6B644E8A@ecal.com>
"Geoffrey M. Clemm" wrote: > And based on a few minutes of thought (and therefore at risk of being > significantly wrong :-), I believe that the new "bind" style advanced > collections being proposed would be very compatible with a server that > wanted to present several "ordered collections" containing the same > resources, but sorted by different orderings. Mmm, that sounds like it'd be good for read-only, but you could run into trouble if you wanted to add a resource to one of the orderings. -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal Corp. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/
Received on Monday, 12 April 1999 13:24:58 UTC