Re: GET and PUT on References: New language for the spec

John Tigue wrote:
> For the PUT case we could suggest something like the following DTD
> snippet:
> <!ELEMENT HTML (HEAD, BODY) >
> <!ELEMENT HEAD ANY >
> <!ELEMENT BODY ( A, A, %TheUsualSuspects; ) >
>
> And prose explaining that the first A is for the target and the second
> is for the reference.
Question: Do we need the reference A? It's just the URL that was fetched,
isn't it?
I suppose we might, if there were multiple references along the way or
something. I'd suggest the second A should be optional, though.
> I agree. I'm just trying to help adoption on the low end by enabling
> JavaScript.
OK, yeah, that does seem worthwhile.
--
/====================================================================\
|John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported |
|Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================|
|Netscape Comm. Corp. | Cogito ergo Spud. (I think, therefore |
|francis@netscape.com | I yam.) |
\====================================================================/
New area code for work number: 650

Received on Tuesday, 7 July 1998 18:13:55 UTC

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /