Re: Sequential and Max Push ID (was Re: Push ID - Merge Imminent)

On 10 August 2017 at 08:00, Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> wrote:
> I think it's useful to avoid HoLB since the first request and the
> MAX_PUSH_ID frame may get reordered and/or the MAX_PUSH_ID frame may need
> retransmission. Push is already weak on benefits, so (without any evidence)
> I wonder whether any benefits due to it would be sensitive to this small
> variation.
>
I was going to make exactly the same point, but then I realized that you
can't push without SETTINGS anyway and that has the exact same properties.