Reminder: HTTPbis WG meeting Friday, March 31, 14:00 UTC Julian Reschke (Thursday, 30 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 29 March)
Position of HPACK Dynamic Table Size Update Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa (Wednesday, 29 March)
- RE: Position of HPACK Dynamic Table Size Update Mike Bishop (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: Position of HPACK Dynamic Table Size Update Cory Benfield (Thursday, 30 March)
Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification Samuel Hurst (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification Samuel Hurst (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification Ryan Hamilton (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification Samuel Hurst (Wednesday, 29 March)
draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, Relaxing UTF-8 requirement for `keyid` Kit Cambridge (Thursday, 23 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, Relaxing UTF-8 requirement for `keyid` Martin Thomson (Saturday, 25 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, Relaxing UTF-8 requirement for `keyid` Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 29 March)
Is a payload always a representation? Yi, EungJun (Monday, 27 March)
- Re: Is a payload always a representation? Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 27 March)
- Re: Is a payload always a representation? Yi, EungJun (Tuesday, 28 March)
Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08.txt> (Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP) to Proposed Standard The IESG (Thursday, 23 March)
Document Action: 'Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-11.txt) The IESG (Monday, 20 March)
Re: since we've met last time mike (Sunday, 19 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-11.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 17 March)
Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: (with COMMENT) Stephen Farrell (Thursday, 16 March)
FYI: Browser caching tests Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 16 March)
Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: (with COMMENT) Ben Campbell (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: (with COMMENT) Martin Thomson (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: (with COMMENT) Ben Campbell (Thursday, 16 March)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-02.txt Vlad Krasnov (Wednesday, 15 March)
HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98 Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Re: HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98 Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Re: HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98 Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 15 March)
Comments on draft-montenegro-httpbis-h2ot-profile-00 Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 14 March)
- RE: Comments on draft-montenegro-httpbis-h2ot-profile-00 Gabriel Montenegro (Wednesday, 15 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 13 March)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-01.txt Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 15 March)
draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" Julian Reschke (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" Martin Thomson (Monday, 13 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 15 March)
on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Patrick McManus (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 10 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Mike Bishop (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Patrick McManus (Saturday, 11 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Mike Bishop (Monday, 13 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 14 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Mike Bishop (Monday, 13 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Stefan Eissing (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Patrick McManus (Saturday, 11 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Mike Bishop (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Willy Tarreau (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Patrick McManus (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Alex Rousskov (Friday, 10 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Mike Bishop (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 12 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Mike Bishop (Monday, 13 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 12 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 11 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Mike Bishop (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 12 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 14 March)
HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Mike Bishop (Thursday, 9 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Alcides Viamontes E (Thursday, 9 March)
- RE: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Mike Bishop (Thursday, 9 March)
- RE: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Mike Bishop (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Eric Rescorla (Friday, 10 March)
- RE: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Mike Bishop (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Ryan Hamilton (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Cory Benfield (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Eric Rescorla (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Adrien de Croy (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Martin Thomson (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Adrien de Croy (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Andy Green (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Daniel Stenberg (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Andy Green (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Adrien de Croy (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Martin Thomson (Friday, 10 March)
- RE: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 Lucas Pardue (Friday, 10 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 8 March)
Protocol Action: 'Indicating Character Encoding and Language for HTTP Header Field Parameters' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-05.txt) The IESG (Monday, 6 March)
2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Wesley Oliver (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Jim Reid (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Wesley Oliver (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Wesley Oliver (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
- RE: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Michael Thornburgh (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Martin J. Dürst (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Cyrus Daboo (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Michael Douglass (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net (Monday, 20 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Amos Jeffries (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Michael Sweet (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Monday, 20 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Monday, 27 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Wesley Oliver (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Wesley Oliver (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
- RE: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Michael Thornburgh (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Martin J. Dürst (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: 2017年03月06日- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding Joe Touch (Tuesday, 7 March)
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) RFC Errata System (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) Karl Dubost (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) Karl Dubost (Monday, 6 March)
Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08.txt Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 3 March)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-05.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 2 March)
Re: Secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: Secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Martin Thomson (Thursday, 2 March)
DRAFT agenda for Chicago Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 1 March)
- Re: DRAFT agenda for Chicago Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 1 March)
Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 27 February)
103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Vasiliy Faronov (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Mark Nottingham (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 30 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Mark Nottingham (Friday, 17 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Vasiliy Faronov (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers Kazuho Oku (Monday, 27 February)
[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7540 (4925) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4665) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Verified] RFC7233 (4664) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Rejected] RFC7540 (4663) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4616) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4682) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (4891) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Rejected] RFC7540 (4871) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7540 (4666) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7231 (4689) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 23 February)
Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 23 February)
Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks matt (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Matthew Kerwin (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Amos Jeffries (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Willy Tarreau (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Amos Jeffries (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 26 February)
Re: Partial review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [OPS-DIR] Partial review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04 jouni.nospam (Tuesday, 21 February)
Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10.txt> (Opportunistic Security for HTTP) to Experimental RFC The IESG (Monday, 20 February)
draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07, "2. The "aes128gcm" HTTP Content Coding" Julian Reschke (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07, "2. The "aes128gcm" HTTP Content Coding" Martin Thomson (Monday, 20 February)
H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Stefan Eissing (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Stefan Eissing (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Martin Thomson (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Martin Thomson (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Martin Thomson (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Stefan Eissing (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 17 February)
[Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (4838) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 16 February)
[Errata Verified] RFC7230 (4839) RFC Errata System (Thursday, 16 February)
Third Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 16 February)
Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Alex Rousskov (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Alex Rousskov (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 4 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Saturday, 4 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Alex Rousskov (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Tom Bergan (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? Alex Rousskov (Tuesday, 28 February)
The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Dave Dolson (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Ryan Hamilton (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Ryan Hamilton (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 15 February)
- RE: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Mike Bishop (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Tom Bergan (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Tom Bergan (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Tom Bergan (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Tom Bergan (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Ryan Hamilton (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Willy Tarreau (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Ryan Hamilton (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Roland Zink (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Amos Jeffries (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Francesco Chemolli (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Chris Bentzel (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Mark Nottingham (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Mark Nottingham (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Tuesday, 28 February)
- UI | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Wednesday, 1 March)
- forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Wednesday, 1 March)
- RE: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Mike Bishop (Wednesday, 1 March)
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Kari Hurtta (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Mark Nottingham (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Chris Bentzel (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Francesco Chemolli (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Roland Zink (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 1 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 5 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Alex Rousskov (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 28 February)
Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Loïc Hoguin (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Jason T. Greene (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Jacob Champion (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Jacob Champion (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Alex Rousskov (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Alex Rousskov (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Jacob Champion (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Alex Rousskov (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Alex Rousskov (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Matthew Kerwin (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Alex Rousskov (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Alex Rousskov (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Cory Benfield (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? Cory Benfield (Wednesday, 15 February)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07.txt Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 14 February)
status of rfc6265bis? Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Daniel Veditz (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Adam Barth (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 14 February)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame-02.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 13 February)
T-E chunked trailers Ashok Kumar (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: T-E chunked trailers Mark Nottingham (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: T-E chunked trailers Willy Tarreau (Friday, 10 February)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-00.txt Ilari Liusvaara (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-00.txt Emily Stark (Thursday, 9 February)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00.txt Kazuho Oku (Thursday, 9 February)
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) RFC Errata System (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103) Kazuho Oku (Tuesday, 7 February)
Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04.txt> (Indicating Character Encoding and Language for HTTP Header Field Parameters) to Proposed Standard The IESG (Monday, 6 February)
Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT Emily Stark (Saturday, 4 February)
Second Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Second Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 8 February)
back on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 1 February)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 1 February)
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mike Bishop (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Tom Bergan (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Tom Bergan (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Tom Bergan (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Tom Bergan (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Wenbo Zhu (Saturday, 11 February)
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mike Bishop (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 11 February)
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mike Bishop (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Matt Menke (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Alex Rousskov (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
ORIGIN - suggested changes Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Ilari Liusvaara (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Nick Sullivan (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Frederik Deweerdt (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Martin Thomson (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 2 February)
- RE: ORIGIN - suggested changes Mike Bishop (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 2 February)
- RE: ORIGIN - suggested changes Mike Bishop (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Stefan Eissing (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Patrick McManus (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Stefan Eissing (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Stefan Eissing (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Patrick McManus (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Martin Thomson (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Ilari Liusvaara (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes Frederik Deweerdt (Wednesday, 15 February)
draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 1 February)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Mike Bishop (Wednesday, 1 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: Example 2.1. Alternative Server Opt-In Kari Hurtta (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: Example 2.1. Alternative Server Opt-In Martin Thomson (Friday, 3 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control Kari Hurtta (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control Martin Thomson (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control Kari Hurtta (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control Martin Thomson (Saturday, 4 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Kari Hurtta (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 Martin Thomson (Monday, 6 February)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 1 February)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Nick Doty (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Nick Doty (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Ilya Grigorik (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Ilya Grigorik (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Mark Nottingham (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Ilya Grigorik (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Ilya Grigorik (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Ilya Grigorik (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Nick Doty (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 February)
RE: Change to padding in encryption -- examples look ok Manger, James (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Change to padding in encryption -- examples look ok Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 31 January)
RE: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access Manger, James (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access Martin Thomson (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access Manger, James (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access Martin Thomson (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access Manger, James (Monday, 30 January)
Change to padding in encryption Martin Thomson (Monday, 30 January)
HTTP/2 plaintext upgrade Cory Benfield (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 plaintext upgrade Loïc Hoguin (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 plaintext upgrade Daniel Stenberg (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 plaintext upgrade Kazuho Oku (Friday, 27 January)
[ietf-http-wg] <none> geronimotita@gmail.com (Thursday, 26 January)
[Errata Rejected] RFC7231 (4734) RFC Errata System (Wednesday, 25 January)
[ietf-http-wg] <none> geronimotita@gmail.com (Tuesday, 24 January)
Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Tom Bergan (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Kazuho Oku (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? 山本和彦 (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Tom Bergan (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? 山本和彦 (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Tom Bergan (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Tom Bergan (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? 山本和彦 (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Kazuho Oku (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Cory Benfield (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Stefan Eissing (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Tom Bergan (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? 山本和彦 (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? 山本和彦 (Tuesday, 24 January)
aes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacks Manger, James (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacks Martin Thomson (Monday, 23 January)
Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2 蕭雋涵 (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2 Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2 Cory Benfield (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2 蕭雋涵 (Sunday, 22 January)
- Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2 Cory Benfield (Saturday, 21 January)
Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Martin Thomson (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Cory Benfield (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 laike9m (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Scott Mitchell (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Martin Thomson (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Scott Mitchell (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 Martin Thomson (Monday, 23 January)
Shared Dictionaries (SDCH and friends) chaals@yandex-team.ru (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Shared Dictionaries (SDCH and friends) Martin Thomson (Friday, 20 January)
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4664) Mark Nottingham (Friday, 20 January)
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838) Mark Nottingham (Friday, 20 January)
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Mark Nottingham (Friday, 20 January)
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4616) Mark Nottingham (Friday, 20 January)
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4682) Mark Nottingham (Friday, 20 January)
Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Benedikt Christoph Wolters (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Matthew Kerwin (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Matthew Kerwin (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Kazuho Oku (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Patrick McManus (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Kazuho Oku (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Patrick McManus (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Patrick McManus (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Patrick McManus (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Tom Bergan (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames laike9m (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Tom Bergan (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames laike9m (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Tom Bergan (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Scott Mitchell (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Daurnimator (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Cory Benfield (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames Patrick McManus (Thursday, 19 January)
aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Manger, James (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Julian Reschke (Sunday, 12 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Martin Thomson (Sunday, 12 February)
- RE: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Manger, James (Sunday, 12 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Martin Thomson (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Daurnimator (Thursday, 16 February)
- RE: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Manger, James (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Daurnimator (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Martin Thomson (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- RE: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Manger, James (Sunday, 12 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Martin Thomson (Sunday, 12 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? Julian Reschke (Sunday, 12 February)
Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Lucas Pardue (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Kari Hurtta (Monday, 16 January)
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Lucas Pardue (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson (Monday, 16 January)
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Lucas Pardue (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson (Thursday, 19 January)
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Lucas Pardue (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson (Monday, 16 January)
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Mike Bishop (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 17 January)
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type Mike Bishop (Monday, 16 January)
aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Sunday, 15 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Martin Thomson (Monday, 16 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Martin Thomson (Monday, 16 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Ilari Liusvaara (Monday, 23 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Martin Thomson (Monday, 23 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 25 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Ilari Liusvaara (Friday, 27 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Martin Thomson (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Ilari Liusvaara (Monday, 23 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Martin Thomson (Monday, 16 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? Manger, James (Monday, 16 January)
Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Patrick McManus (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Martin Thomson (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Julian Reschke (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Barry Leiba (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Mark Nottingham (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 16 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Thursday, 12 January)
UPDATE TO PREFERENCE - return=representation (request for expert review) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 12 January)
NEW PREFERENCE - depth-noroot (request for expert review) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: NEW PREFERENCE - depth-noroot (request for expert review) Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: NEW PREFERENCE - depth-noroot (request for expert review) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 12 January)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 9 January)
Question regarding RFC 7230 Hartford, Eric (Friday, 6 January)
- Re: Question regarding RFC 7230 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 7 January)
- Re: Question regarding RFC 7230 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 8 January)
- Re: Question regarding RFC 7230 James M Snell (Monday, 9 January)
Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range Martin J. Dürst (Wednesday, 4 January)
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 3 January)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Kari Hurtta (Friday, 6 January)
Very large values (Re: Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges) Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 3 January)
- Re: Very large values (Re: Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges) Craig Pratt (Tuesday, 3 January)
Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Martin Thomson (Monday, 2 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Kari Hurtta (Tuesday, 3 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 3 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Kari Hurtta (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 10 January)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (was wrong draft) | Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Kari Hurtta (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (was wrong draft) | Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 11 January)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (was wrong draft) | Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Kari Hurtta (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 10 January)
Re: Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges Craig Pratt (Monday, 2 January)
- Re: Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges Patrick McManus (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges Craig Pratt (Tuesday, 21 February)
Last message date: Thursday, 30 March 2017 12:29:02 UTC