- From: 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
- Date: 2013年5月28日 12:43:47 -0700
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA4WUYh5ghPLBwHpezZ-dq7TjNXM2t+5oFppRaJ7eJ_M_Zd3BA@mail.gmail.com>
I have feelings about this bike shed color, but I don't care enough to argue why mine is the best color ever. I am satisfied that there is a way to convey priority within the same frame as the headers. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > At the time Roberto made the argument that the number of flags (8) was > more sparse than the number of frame types (256), but IIRC this was based > on the flags applying to all Control frames. At this point we have (at > least implicitly) decided that flags are frame-type specific (see PONG > flag), so I don't believe the argument is valid any more. > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I remember having almost this exact discussion in Tokyo. The only >> point that didn't come up this time was an argument Roberto made, >> namely: "A frame type is cheaper (fewer bits) than a flag." >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 19:44:17 UTC