- From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Date: 2012年7月18日 09:07:19 -0400
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>, grahame@healthintersections.com.au, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1342616839.30417.46.camel@ds9>
On Wed, 2012年07月18日 at 08:09 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:22:24PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > The issue with HTTP/2 will indeed be the same as with IPv6 : HTTP/2 will > be deployed between the browser and the load balancer, and everything > behind will remain HTTP/1 due to the added nuisances of deploying 2.0 > everywhere. Except we know that in the very near future SPDY adoption will have reached far more people than IPv6 ever has. So, unlike IPv6, there is a big demand to solve the problems it addresses. > Almost nobody does IPv6 between LB and server nowadays, it's > added cost for no benefit. > of course spdy has lots of benefits. key difference :)
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 13:08:01 UTC