Adjusting our spec names Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Adjusting our spec names Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
Protocols, extensions, compatibility Adrien W. de Croy (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Protocols, extensions, compatibility Mike Belshe (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Protocols, extensions, compatibility Peter Lepeska (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Protocols, extensions, compatibility Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Protocols, extensions, compatibility Peter Lepeska (Saturday, 31 March)
Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility 陈智昌 (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Adrien W. de Croy (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Adrien W. de Croy (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mike Belshe (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility 陈智昌 (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Roberto Peon (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Roberto Peon (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Adrien W. de Croy (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Backwards compatibility Mark Watson (Friday, 30 March)
Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Kevin Cathcart (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Roberto Peon (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic tom (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Roberto Peon (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Mike Belshe (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic tom (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic tom (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Adrien W. de Croy (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Adrien W. de Croy (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Adrien W. de Croy (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Adrien W. de Croy (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Adrien W. de Croy (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Adrien W. de Croy (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Kevin Cathcart (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
multiplexing -- don't do it Peter L (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Brian Pane (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it J Ross Nicoll (Friday, 30 March)
- RE: multiplexing -- don't do it Peter L (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Brian Pane (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Roberto Peon (Friday, 30 March)
- RE: multiplexing -- don't do it Peter L (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Adrien W. de Croy (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Alexey Melnikov (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Adrien W. de Croy (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Mike Belshe (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Julian Reschke (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it イアンフェッティ (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Alexey Melnikov (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Roberto Peon (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Adrien W. de Croy (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Mike Belshe (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Adam Barth (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Brian Pane (Friday, 30 March)
- RE: multiplexing -- don't do it Peter L (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Peter L (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: multiplexing -- don't do it Peter L (Saturday, 31 March)
Data Protection at IETF83 [HTTP2.0 SPDY] Henry Story (Thursday, 29 March)
- RE: Data Protection at IETF83 [HTTP2.0 SPDY] Murray S. Kucherawy (Thursday, 29 March)
RE: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Tobias Oberstein (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Yuchung Cheng (Thursday, 29 March)
- AW: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Tobias Oberstein (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Adrien W. de Croy (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Salam J (Thursday, 29 March)
- RE: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com (Thursday, 29 March)
- RE: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com (Thursday, 29 March)
- AW: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Tobias Oberstein (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Ted Hardie (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Martin Thomson (Friday, 30 March)
- AW: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Tobias Oberstein (Friday, 30 March)
- RE: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com (Friday, 30 March)
The HTTP vs SPDY debate Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Karl Dubost (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Julian Reschke (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Salam J (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Mike Belshe (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Willy Tarreau (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Mike Belshe (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Willy Tarreau (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Mike Belshe (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 31 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Mike Belshe (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Willy Tarreau (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Mike Belshe (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Willy Tarreau (Friday, 30 March)
- Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate Henry Story (Thursday, 29 March)
fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks gabriel montenegro (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Adrien W. de Croy (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Wesley Eddy (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Mike Belshe (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Adrien W. de Croy (Thursday, 29 March)
- RE: fyi: An Experimental Study of Web Transport Protocols in Cellular Networks Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com (Thursday, 29 March)
New Version Notification for draft-tarreau-httpbis-network-friendly-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-tarreau-httpbis-network-friendly-00.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-tarreau-httpbis-network-friendly-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 28 March)
Proposal for closing with no action: #247 / #322 / #266 / #340 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 March)
#346: Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: #346: Registry policies Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: #346: Registry policies Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: #346: Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 March)
The TLS hammer and resource integrity Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Adrien W. de Croy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity J Ross Nicoll (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Henry Story (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity patrick mcmanus (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Mike Belshe (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Roberto Peon (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Roberto Peon (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity patrick mcmanus (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re[2]: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Adrien W. de Croy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Henry Story (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity patrick mcmanus (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Henry Story (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Robert Collins (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Adrien W. de Croy (Thursday, 29 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Roberto Peon (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Mike Belshe (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Henry Story (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Adrien W. de Croy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Henry Story (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Roberto Peon (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Roberto Peon (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Henry Story (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Adrien W. de Croy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Henry Story (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: The TLS hammer and resource integrity Martin Thomson (Thursday, 29 March)
draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Murray S. Kucherawy (Tuesday, 27 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Peter Saint-Andre (Tuesday, 27 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- RE: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Murray S. Kucherawy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- RE: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Murray S. Kucherawy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- RE: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Murray S. Kucherawy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- RE: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Murray S. Kucherawy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 28 March)
- RE: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Murray S. Kucherawy (Wednesday, 28 March)
- Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary Martin Thomson (Wednesday, 28 March)
HTTP 2.0/flag day Ted Hardie (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: HTTP 2.0/flag day Julian Reschke (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: HTTP 2.0/flag day Mark Nottingham (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: HTTP 2.0/flag day Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: HTTP 2.0/flag day Amos Jeffries (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: HTTP 2.0/flag day Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 27 March)
Fwd: Document Action: 'The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)' to Experimental RFC (draft-reschke-http-status-308-07.txt) Peter Saint-Andre (Monday, 26 March)
- #312, was: Fwd: Document Action: 'The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)' to Experimental RFC (draft-reschke-http-status-308-07.txt) Julian Reschke (Monday, 26 March)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-07.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 26 March)
HTTP/2.0 goal: polcy enforcement Adrien W. de Croy (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: HTTP/2.0 goal: polcy enforcement Adam Barth (Monday, 26 March)
- Re[2]: HTTP/2.0 goal: polcy enforcement Adrien W. de Croy (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: HTTP/2.0 goal: polcy enforcement Willy Tarreau (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: Re[2]: HTTP/2.0 goal: polcy enforcement Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: Re[2]: HTTP/2.0 goal: polcy enforcement Mike Belshe (Monday, 26 March)
- Re[2]: HTTP/2.0 goal: polcy enforcement Adrien W. de Croy (Monday, 26 March)
editorial feedback on draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 24 March)
- Re: editorial feedback on draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00 陈智昌 (Saturday, 24 March)
- Re: editorial feedback on draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: editorial feedback on draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 24 March)
- SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Peter Saint-Andre (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Willy Tarreau (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Barry Leiba (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? tom (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Peter Saint-Andre (Sunday, 25 March)
- SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Sunday, 25 March)
- Re[2]: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Adrien W. de Croy (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Brian Pane (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? patrick mcmanus (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Mike Belshe (Monday, 26 March)
- Re[2]: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Adrien W. de Croy (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Peter Saint-Andre (Monday, 26 March)
- Re[2]: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Adrien W. de Croy (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Peter Saint-Andre (Monday, 26 March)
- Re[2]: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Adrien W. de Croy (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: Re[2]: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Peter Saint-Andre (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Adrien W. de Croy (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Henry Story (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? patrick mcmanus (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Brian Pane (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ? Robert Collins (Tuesday, 27 March)
Keep-Alive and 'max' Martin Thomson (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: Keep-Alive and 'max' patrick mcmanus (Saturday, 24 March)
- Re: Keep-Alive and 'max' Martin Thomson (Saturday, 24 March)
Agenda for Paris Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 22 March)
Issues addressed in the -19 drafts Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 22 March)
draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00: auth schemes Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00: auth schemes Mike Belshe (Monday, 26 March)
Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Adam Barth (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re[2]: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re[2]: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Re[2]: Bad browser behaviour? Adam Barth (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re[4]: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Re[4]: Bad browser behaviour? Adam Barth (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 20 March)
- RE: Bad browser behaviour? Robert Brewer (Tuesday, 20 March)
- RE: Bad browser behaviour? Eric Lawrence (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re[4]: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re[2]: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re[4]: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re: Bad browser behaviour? Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 20 March)
- Re[2]: Bad browser behaviour? Adrien W. de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
WG Action: RECHARTER: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) IESG Secretary (Monday, 19 March)
[ietf-http-wg] <none> Dang Thi Thu van (Saturday, 17 March)
WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Mark Nottingham (Friday, 16 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 16 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 18 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Zhong Yu (Thursday, 22 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Mark Nottingham (Monday, 26 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Zhong Yu (Thursday, 22 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Mark Nottingham (Monday, 19 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 18 March)
- Re: WGLC Issue for p4: Optionality of Conditional Request Support Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 21 March)
WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Mark Nottingham (Friday, 16 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 21 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Alexey Melnikov (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Mark Nottingham (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Martin Thomson (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Amos Jeffries (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Martin Thomson (Saturday, 24 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Amos Jeffries (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Martin Thomson (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Peter Saint-Andre (Tuesday, 27 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Mark Nottingham (Friday, 23 March)
- Re: WGLC issue for p7: "strength" Alexey Melnikov (Friday, 23 March)
WGLC review of p4-19 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 16 March)
WGLC issue: "Realms and scope" in p7 Martin Thomson (Friday, 16 March)
- Re: WGLC issue: "Realms and scope" in p7 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 21 March)
WGLC review of p5-19 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 16 March)
WGLC review of p7-19 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 March)
Working Group Last Call: httpbis p4 / p5 / p6 / p7 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 March)
- Re: Working Group Last Call: httpbis p4 / p5 / p6 / p7 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 15 March)
- Re: Working Group Last Call: httpbis p4 / p5 / p6 / p7 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 22 March)
Re: [whatwg] some thoughts on bring HTTP upon UDP: iWebPP - instant web p2p technology tom (Wednesday, 14 March)
httpbis -19 drafts Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 13 March)
- Re: httpbis -19 drafts Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 13 March)
- Re: httpbis -19 drafts Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 13 March)
- Re: httpbis -19 drafts Zhong Yu (Wednesday, 14 March)
- Re: httpbis -19 drafts Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 March)
- Re: httpbis -19 drafts Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 13 March)
- Re: httpbis -19 drafts Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 13 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 12 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 12 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 12 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 12 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 12 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 12 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 12 March)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-06.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 12 March)
Re: #322: Origin Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 March)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-05.txt Julian Reschke (Sunday, 11 March)
#338Content-Location doesn't constrain the cardinality of representations Julian Reschke (Saturday, 10 March)
- Re: #338Content-Location doesn't constrain the cardinality of representations Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 March)
#331: clarify that 201 doesn't require Location header fields Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: #331: clarify that 201 doesn't require Location header fields Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 8 March)
- Re: #331: clarify that 201 doesn't require Location header fields Julian Reschke (Friday, 9 March)
- Re: #331: clarify that 201 doesn't require Location header fields Julian Reschke (Saturday, 10 March)
- Re: #331: clarify that 201 doesn't require Location header fields Julian Reschke (Friday, 9 March)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pettersen-cache-context-06.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Tuesday, 6 March)
http+aes Julian Reschke (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Julian Reschke (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Stefan Eissing (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Julian Reschke (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Stefan Eissing (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Amos Jeffries (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Julian Reschke (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Julian Reschke (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Stefan Eissing (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Eric J. Bowman (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Eric J. Bowman (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Eric J. Bowman (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Eric J. Bowman (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Carsten Bormann (Tuesday, 6 March)
- RE: http+aes Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: http+aes Eric Rescorla (Wednesday, 7 March)
- RE: http+aes Manger, James H (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: http+aes Anthony Bryan (Thursday, 8 March)
- Re: http+aes Carsten Bormann (Thursday, 8 March)
- Re: http+aes David Morris (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 6 March)
- RE: http+aes Michael Wojcik (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: http+aes Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 7 March)
- RE: http+aes Michael Wojcik (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: http+aes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Carsten Bormann (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: http+aes Julian Reschke (Monday, 12 March)
RFC 2617 erratum on DIGEST auth Peter Saint-Andre (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: RFC 2617 erratum on DIGEST auth Henrik Nordström (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: RFC 2617 erratum on DIGEST auth Peter Saint-Andre (Tuesday, 6 March)
Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Registry policies Julian Reschke (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Registry policies Martin J. Dürst (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Registry policies Martin J. Dürst (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Registry policies Adrien de Croy (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Registry policies Julian Reschke (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Friday, 2 March)
- #247 and Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Julian Reschke (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 7 March)
- #346: Consistent Registry Policies Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: #346: Consistent Registry Policies Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: #346: Consistent Registry Policies Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 8 March)
- Re: #346: Consistent Registry Policies Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 March)
- Re: #346: Consistent Registry Policies Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 8 March)
- Re: #346: Consistent Registry Policies Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 March)
- #346: Consistent Registry Policies Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 7 March)
- Re: #247 and Registry policies Julian Reschke (Monday, 5 March)
Cache-Control: no-cache Zhong Yu (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Cache-Control: no-cache Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 1 March)
#334: recipient behavior for new auth parameters Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: #334: recipient behavior for new auth parameters Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: #334: recipient behavior for new auth parameters Julian Reschke (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: #334: recipient behavior for new auth parameters Julian Reschke (Sunday, 4 March)
- Re: #334: recipient behavior for new auth parameters Julian Reschke (Thursday, 1 March)
Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Julian Reschke (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Julian Reschke (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates James M Snell (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Carsten Bormann (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates James M Snell (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Julian Reschke (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Philippe Mougin (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Eric J. Bowman (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Carsten Bormann (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Carsten Bormann (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Idempotent partial updates Mike Kelly (Thursday, 1 March)
HTTP at a glance Fiona Schmidtke (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Amos Jeffries (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Amos Jeffries (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP at a glance Fiona Schmidtke (Monday, 27 February)
IPRs submitted for draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy Roberto Peon (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: IPRs submitted for draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy Mark Nottingham (Friday, 24 February)
Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt patrick mcmanus (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Eric Rescorla (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Henrik Nordström (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 3 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt saravanakumar Annamalaisami (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Eric Rescorla (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Mike Belshe (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Brian Pane (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Brian Pane (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Brian Pane (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: Review: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00.txt Philippe Mougin (Friday, 2 March)
For review: draft-snell-additional-link-relations-00 James M Snell (Thursday, 23 February)
HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Zhong Yu (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Zhong Yu (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Ben Niven-Jenkins (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Zhong Yu (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Zhong Yu (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.0 request - should the server close the connection after response? Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) IESG Secretary (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Tim Bray (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Albert Lunde (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Salvatore Loreto (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Robert Collins (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Barry Leiba (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Robert Collins (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Barry Leiba (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) David Morris (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Peter Saint-Andre (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Paul Hoffman (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Paul Hoffman (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Peter Saint-Andre (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Paul Hoffman (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Tim Bray (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Tim Bray (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Paul Hoffman (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Yoav Nir (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 29 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Tim Bray (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Paul Hoffman (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephen Farrell (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Amos Jeffries (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Patrik Fältström (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) John C Klensin (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Patrik Fältström (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Andrews (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) John C Klensin (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Willy Tarreau (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Patrik Fältström (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) John C Klensin (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Doug Barton (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Tim Bray (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) SM (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Peter Saint-Andre (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Paul Hoffman (Thursday, 1 March)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 1 March)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-03.txt Amos Jeffries (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-03.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 20 February)
Dale Anderson has lost touch and any casual acquaintances feel free to CC him (EOM) Dale Anderson (Sunday, 19 February)
Re: Last Call: <draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt> (The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)) to Experimental RFC Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt> (The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)) to Experimental RFC Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 March)
Secure (https) proxy authentification Nicolas Mailhot (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Nicolas Mailhot (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Nicolas Mailhot (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Henry Story (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Nicolas Mailhot (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Amos Jeffries (Sunday, 19 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Nicolas Mailhot (Sunday, 19 February)
- HTTP error 511 [Was: Secure (https) proxy authentification] Nicolas Mailhot (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: HTTP error 511 [Was: Secure (https) proxy authentification] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: HTTP error 511 [Was: Secure (https) proxy authentification] Nicolas Mailhot (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: HTTP error 511 [Was: Secure (https) proxy authentification] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 21 February)
- HTTP error 511 [Was: Secure (https) proxy authentification] Nicolas Mailhot (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: Secure (https) proxy authentification Nicolas Mailhot (Saturday, 18 February)
RFC format - time for an update? Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: RFC format - time for an update? Carsten Bormann (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: RFC format - time for an update? Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: RFC format - time for an update? Alexey Melnikov (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: RFC format - time for an update? Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: RFC format - time for an update? Julian Reschke (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: RFC format - time for an update? Martin J. Dürst (Friday, 17 February)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt Cyrus Daboo (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt Martin Thomson (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 16 February)
#337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Amos Jeffries (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 3 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 3 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Henrik Nordström (Saturday, 3 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Monday, 5 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 3 March)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #337: Field names in cache-control header arguments Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
Charter revision Mark Nottingham (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Robert Collins (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Peter Saint-Andre (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Amos Jeffries (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Willy Tarreau (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Mark Nottingham (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Julian Reschke (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Amos Jeffries (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Julian Reschke (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Poul-Henning Kamp (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: Charter revision Mark Nottingham (Friday, 10 February)
Issues addressed in the -18 drafts Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 February)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-04.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 February)
Re: Whitespace before responses Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Patrick McManus (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Zhong Yu (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Whitespace before responses Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 February)
part 2, 5.1 "the response payload is a representation of the target resource" Jonathan A Rees (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: part 2, 5.1 "the response payload is a representation of the target resource" Jonathan A Rees (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: part 2, 5.1 "the response payload is a representation of the target resource" Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: part 2, 5.1 "the response payload is a representation of the target resource" Jonathan A Rees (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: part 2, 5.1 "the response payload is a representation of the target resource" Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 11 February)
#342 WWW-Authenticate ABNF slightly ambiguous Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #342 WWW-Authenticate ABNF slightly ambiguous Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 February)
#227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Amos Jeffries (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Erlend Hamnaberg (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Willy Tarreau (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Henrik Nordström (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Henrik Nordström (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Henrik Nordström (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Erlend Hamnaberg (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Henrik Nordström (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 3 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Friday, 2 March)
- Re: #227: HEAD and Caches Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
Re: Comments on Section 6.1 (Persistent Connections) of HTTPbis Part 1, version 17 Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
chunk-extensions Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 7 February)
- #343: chunk-extensions Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #343: chunk-extensions Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Zhong Yu (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Henrik Nordström (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Daniel Stenberg (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: chunk-extensions Zhong Yu (Friday, 17 February)
#328: user Intervention on Redirects Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Chris Weber (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Chris Weber (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Chris Weber (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Adam Barth (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Henrik Nordström (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #238, was: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #238, was: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #238, was: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: #238, was: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #238, was: #328: user Intervention on Redirects Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Additional HTTP Status Codes' to Proposed Standard (draft-nottingham-http-new-status-04.txt) Julian Reschke (Monday, 6 February)
#302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302) Julian Reschke (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: #302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302) Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: #302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302) Julian Reschke (Monday, 6 February)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-03.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 1 February)
"entirely determined by the URI owner(s)" Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 1 February)
Confusion in preconditions Sebastien Lambla (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Zhong Yu (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Zhong Yu (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Zhong Yu (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Eric J. Bowman (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Zhong Yu (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Confusion in preconditions Henrik Nordström (Monday, 6 February)
Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header James Snell (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header James Snell (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header James Snell (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header Cyrus Daboo (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header James Snell (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header Julian Reschke (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header James Snell (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header James Snell (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header James Snell (Wednesday, 8 February)
Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? David Booth (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? David Booth (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? David Morris (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Increasing precision of Last-Modified header to allow sub-second granularity? Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 31 January)
Content-Disposition in PUT/POST Arnaud Quillaud (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Content-Disposition in PUT/POST Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
feedback on draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, "3. The 'encoding' auth-param" Alexei Khlebnikov (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: feedback on draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, "3. The 'encoding' auth-param" Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: feedback on draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, "3. The 'encoding' auth-param" Julian Reschke (Monday, 30 January)
Case sensitivity of Transfer-Codings Dave Bordoley (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Case sensitivity of Transfer-Codings Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 31 January)
- #266, was: Case sensitivity of Transfer-Codings Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Case sensitivity of Transfer-Codings Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
obs-fold Zhong Yu (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: obs-fold Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 31 January)
- #335, was: obs-fold Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: #335, was: obs-fold Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #335, was: obs-fold Zhong Yu (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #335, was: obs-fold Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #335, was: obs-fold Zhong Yu (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #335, was: obs-fold Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Julian Reschke (Sunday, 29 January)
- RE: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Manger, James H (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Martin J. Dürst (Tuesday, 31 January)
- paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Anne van Kesteren (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Anne van Kesteren (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Stefan Eissing (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 4 February)
- paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Manger, James H (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 5 February)
I-D: draft-ietf-appsawg-http-forwarded-00 Andreas Petersson (Saturday, 28 January)
Wrapping up the Preferences Draft James Snell (Friday, 27 January)
Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Zhong Yu (Thursday, 26 January)
- RE: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Jeroen de Borst (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Zhong Yu (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- RE: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Jeroen de Borst (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Amos Jeffries (Monday, 30 January)
- #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Willy Tarreau (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Amos Jeffries (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Willy Tarreau (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Willy Tarreau (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Zhong Yu (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Julian Reschke (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 21 February)
- #341: whitespace in request-lines and status-lines Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Amos Jeffries (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Zhong Yu (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Henrik Nordström (Monday, 6 February)
- #340: CR CR LF Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #340: CR CR LF Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #340: CR CR LF Mark Nottingham (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: #340: CR CR LF Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Misc review notes for draft-18 p1 Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
killing the "compress" transfer coding Dan Winship (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: killing the "compress" transfer coding Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
Connection header and hop-by-hop header fields Dan Winship (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Connection header and hop-by-hop header fields Robert Collins (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Connection header and hop-by-hop header fields Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Connection header and hop-by-hop header fields Robert Collins (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Connection header and hop-by-hop header fields Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
spelling, grammar, and other simple fixes Dan Winship (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: spelling, grammar, and other simple fixes Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 25 January)
- applicability to Proxy authentication, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: applicability to Proxy authentication, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Amos Jeffries (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: applicability to Proxy authentication, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: applicability to Proxy authentication, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Amos Jeffries (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-03.txt Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 26 January)
LINK/UNLINK James Snell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: LINK/UNLINK Martin Thomson (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: LINK/UNLINK Eric J. Bowman (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: LINK/UNLINK Robert Sanderson (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: LINK/UNLINK James Snell (Tuesday, 24 January)
Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis James Snell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Carlos Prado García (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis William A. Rowe Jr. (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Thomas Fossati (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 24 January)
- RE: Rechartering HTTPbis Robert Brewer (Tuesday, 24 January)
- RE: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 26 January)
- RE: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Patrick McManus (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Patrick McManus (Thursday, 26 January)
- RE: Rechartering HTTPbis Robert Brewer (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Patrick McManus (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis William A. Rowe Jr. (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Patrick McManus (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Jose Mathew Manimala (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Jose Mathew Manimala (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Patrick McManus (Thursday, 26 January)
- Header field name representation, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Header field name representation, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Header field name representation, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
- RE: Header field name representation, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Jeroen de Borst (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Header field name representation, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Peter Saint-Andre (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Header field name representation, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis David Morris (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis patrick mcmanus (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis patrick mcmanus (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Patrick McManus (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Thomas Fossati (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- RE: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Markus Lanthaler (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Henrik Nordström (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Henrik Nordström (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Henrik Nordström (Monday, 6 February)
- header field value character encoding, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Willy Tarreau (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Dale Anderson (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis 陈智昌 (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Poul-Henning Kamp (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Rechartering HTTPbis Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Security Properties, was: Rechartering HTTPbis Mark Nottingham (Friday, 3 February)
[p2-semantics] Method Definitions - PATCH? Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p2-semantics] Method Definitions - PATCH? Julian Reschke (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p2-semantics] Method Definitions - PATCH? Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p2-semantics] Method Definitions - PATCH? Julian Reschke (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p2-semantics] Method Definitions - PATCH? Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
[p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Cameron Heavon-Jones (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p1-messaging] 2.7.1. http URI scheme - [ "?" query ] Willy Tarreau (Thursday, 19 January)
Fwd: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Fwd: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Eric J. Bowman (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Amos Jeffries (Friday, 20 January)
- RE: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Eric J. Bowman (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 20 January)
- RE: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Eric J. Bowman (Friday, 20 January)
- RE: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Amos Jeffries (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Ray Polk (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 21 January)
- RE: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Amos Jeffries (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Ray Polk (Thursday, 19 January)
Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Duncan Cragg (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Zhong Yu (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Zhong Yu (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Duncan Cragg (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Duncan Cragg (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Defining the meaning of headers associated with a request body Amos Jeffries (Saturday, 21 January)
preparing for Paris Peter Saint-Andre (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: preparing for Paris Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: preparing for Paris Martin J. Dürst (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: preparing for Paris Peter Saint-Andre (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: preparing for Paris Martin J. Dürst (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: preparing for Paris Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: preparing for Paris Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 19 January)
informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Mykyta Yevstifeyev (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 14 January)
- Redirect fallback requirements (was: Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02) Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 14 January)
- #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 24 January)
- #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements Julian Reschke (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 14 January)
If-None-Match + Range Zhong Yu (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Julian Reschke (Sunday, 15 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Amos Jeffries (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Zhong Yu (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Amos Jeffries (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Zhong Yu (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Zhong Yu (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Amos Jeffries (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Amos Jeffries (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Zhong Yu (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: If-None-Match + Range Amos Jeffries (Monday, 16 January)
Section 2.7.1 of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-18 SM (Monday, 9 January)
- Re: Section 2.7.1 of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-18 Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 9 January)
- Re: Section 2.7.1 of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-18 Poul-Henning Kamp (Monday, 9 January)
- Re: Section 2.7.1 of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-18 SM (Monday, 9 January)
#209, was: [new issue] p1 messaging 4.2. fails to account for requested scheme which impacts http compared to https Julian Reschke (Saturday, 7 January)
[p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Ray Polk (Friday, 6 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 6 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Ray Polk (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: [p3-payload] Media-Type -- Two Values, One Cup Anti-Pattern? Ray Polk (Tuesday, 17 January)
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-status-308-01.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 4 January)
#311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 4 January)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 4 January)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Yves Lafon (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Yves Lafon (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Julian Reschke (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Yves Lafon (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Julian Reschke (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Yves Lafon (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Amos Jeffries (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #311 Add limitations to Range to reduce its use as a denial-of-service tool Yves Lafon (Thursday, 5 January)
httpbis -18 drafts Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-07.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 4 January)
Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Bearer authentication - for proxies? Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 4 January)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Bearer authentication - for proxies? Amos Jeffries (Wednesday, 4 January)
Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 3 January)
- RE: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 4 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 7 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Mark Nottingham (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 7 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 5 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Willy Tarreau (Wednesday, 4 January)
- Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 4 January)
Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Bearer authentication - for proxies? Amos Jeffries (Monday, 2 January)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Bearer authentication - for proxies? Amos Jeffries (Monday, 2 January)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Bearer authentication - for proxies? Amos Jeffries (Tuesday, 3 January)
Re: issue 325: When are Location's semantics triggered?, was: Protocols/APIs and redirects Julian Reschke (Sunday, 1 January)
Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2012 23:53:30 UTC