ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2009 by date

Wednesday, 30 December 2009

Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation [#117] Mark Nottingham
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation [#117] Jamie Lokier
Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation [#117] Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH
Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Mark Nottingham
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP Mutual-auth proposal status / HTTP AUTH meet-up in Anaheim? Yutaka OIWA
Re: HTTP Mutual-auth proposal status / HTTP AUTH meet-up in Anaheim? =JeffH

Monday, 28 December 2009

Re: Last call for comments on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-07 Nicolas Alvarez
Last call for comments on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-07 Julian Reschke

Thursday, 24 December 2009

Re: HTTP Mutual-auth proposal status / HTTP AUTH meet-up in Anaheim? Anthony Bryan
HTTP Mutual-auth proposal status / HTTP AUTH meet-up in Anaheim? Yutaka OIWA

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH

Monday, 21 December 2009

suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH
Re: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Alexey Melnikov
Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 Anthony Bryan
Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 Adam Barth

Friday, 18 December 2009

TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 Henry S. Thompson
Re: Does "obs-" prefix in draft-ietf-httpbis-p* ABNF stand for "obsolete" ? Julian Reschke
Does "obs-" prefix in draft-ietf-httpbis-p* ABNF stand for "obsolete" ? =JeffH

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

Re: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke

Saturday, 12 December 2009

Re: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke
RE: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Paul Leach
RE: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Paul Leach
RE: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Manger, James H

Thursday, 10 December 2009

Wednesday, 9 December 2009

RE: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke
RE: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke
RE: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Eran Hammer-Lahav

Tuesday, 8 December 2009

Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke

Monday, 7 December 2009

RE: Authentication realm Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Authentication realm Roy T. Fielding
Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC Anthony Bryan
RE: Authentication realm Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Authentication realm Julian Reschke

Sunday, 6 December 2009

Authentication realm Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Interpretation of response body in case of PUT and 200 Ok Julian Reschke
Interpretation of response body in case of PUT and 200 Ok Jan Algermissen

Saturday, 5 December 2009

Friday, 4 December 2009

Re: Persistent connection timeout Adrien de Croy
RE: Backwards definition of authentication header Eran Hammer-Lahav
RE: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke
RE: Backwards definition of authentication header Eran Hammer-Lahav
Authentication-Info Header Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: for GET, does the request-target identify information? Julian Reschke
RE: Backwards definition of authentication header Thomas Maslen
RE: Backwards definition of authentication header Eran Hammer-Lahav
RE: Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header field Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: RFC2616 vs draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth Julian Reschke
Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke
Persistent connection timeout Fred Bohle
Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke
Re: Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header field Dan Winship
Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC2616 vs draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth Paul C. Bryan
RE: Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header field Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header field Thomas Broyer
Backwards definition of authentication header Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header field Thomas Broyer
Re: Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header field Daniel Stenberg
Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header field Eran Hammer-Lahav
RFC2616 vs draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth Eran Hammer-Lahav

Wednesday, 2 December 2009

Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: DNS rebinding not mentioned in "HTTP/1.1, part 1" Tyler Close
Re: DNS rebinding not mentioned in "HTTP/1.1, part 1" Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

Re: fyi: W3C web security mailing list (announcement) (was: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy) =JeffH
fyi: W3C web security mailing list (announcement) (was: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy) =JeffH
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Joe Gregorio
W3C web security mailing list (Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy) Thomas Roessler
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Martin J. Dürst
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy =JeffH
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy =JeffH
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Mark Nottingham
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe Jr.
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth

Monday, 30 November 2009

Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
RE: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Manger, James H
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Daniel Stenberg
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Daniel Stenberg
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Mark S. Miller
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Mark Nottingham
Closing #145 - empty authority in URL Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 26 November 2009

Content-Location and etag, was: I-D Action:draft-dusseault-http-patch-16.txt Julian Reschke
Re: Media type for 300/406 responses? Jan Algermissen
Re: Media type for 300/406 responses? Thomas Broyer
RE: I-D Action:draft-dusseault-http-patch-16.txt vishvesh raiter
Media type for 300/406 responses? Jan Algermissen
Re: I-D Action:draft-dusseault-http-patch-16.txt Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Martin J. Dürst
Re: FYI Cache-control deployment Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 25 November 2009

Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Maciej Stachowiak
Re: FYI Cache-control deployment Adrien de Croy
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: FYI Cache-control deployment Roy T. Fielding
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Thomas Roessler
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
FYI Cache-control deployment Adrien de Croy
Last Call: draft-roach-sip-http-subscribe-03 Adam Roach
Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Adrien de Croy
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Adam Barth
Request for Comments: XMLHttpRequest Last Call Working Draft; deadline 15 December 2009 Arthur Barstow
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Thomas Roessler
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp
Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Julian Reschke
Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp
Re: HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Julian Reschke
HTTPbis and the Same Origin Policy Tyler Close
DNS rebinding not mentioned in "HTTP/1.1, part 1" Tyler Close
DNS rebinding not mentioned in "HTTP/1.1, part 1" Tyler Close
Re: CSRF and clickjacking not mentioned in "HTTP/1.1, part 7: Authentication" Julian Reschke
CSRF and clickjacking not mentioned in "HTTP/1.1, part 7: Authentication" Tyler Close

Tuesday, 24 November 2009

for GET, does the request-target identify information? Jonathan Rees

Monday, 23 November 2009

Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan

Friday, 20 November 2009

Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Henrik Nordstrom
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Nicolas Alvarez
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Jamie Lokier
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Julian Reschke
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Jamie Lokier
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Sander Steffann
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Mark Baker
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Martin J. Dürst
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Alexander Limi

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Robert Siemer
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Srirama ChandraSekhar
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Nicolas Alvarez
Re: FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Julian Reschke
FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Anthony Bryan

Monday, 16 November 2009

Re: "start", "first" and "last" in link relations draft, RDFa and (X)HTML Shane McCarron
"start", "first" and "last" in link relations draft, RDFa and (X)HTML Leif Halvard Silli

Friday, 13 November 2009

Re: Input on request for link relation Bill de hOra

Thursday, 12 November 2009

Re: Input on request for link relation Bill de hOra

Friday, 13 November 2009

Re: Duplicate Referrer Header - HTTP.sys barfs - Stack Overflow Julian Reschke
Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Thomas Broyer
Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston

Thursday, 12 November 2009

Re: Input on request for link relation Richard Salz
Re: Duplicate Referrer Header - HTTP.sys barfs - Stack Overflow Mark Nottingham
Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Sylvain Hellegouarch
Fwd: Heads-up: Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1) to be published on Nov 24 Mark Nottingham
Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
Re: Input on request for link relation Joe Gregorio

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Thomas Broyer
Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Nicolas Alvarez
Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Thomas Broyer
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] Nicolas Alvarez
Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Nicolas Alvarez
RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Nicolas Alvarez
RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Nicolas Alvarez
Re: Duplicate Referrer Header - HTTP.sys barfs - Stack Overflow David Morris
Duplicate Referrer Header - HTTP.sys barfs - Stack Overflow Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Re: Multi-server HTTP David Morris
Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke

Monday, 9 November 2009

Срочно продаю квартиру в центре ivan@w3.org

Saturday, 7 November 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 4 November 2009

RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith

Tuesday, 3 November 2009

Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
[Reminder] Review of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Guidelines Francois Daoust

Thursday, 29 October 2009

Re: wrt HTTP Origin header serialization (was Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin)) Adam Barth

Wednesday, 28 October 2009

Tuesday, 27 October 2009

wrt HTTP Origin header serialization (was Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin)) =JeffH
Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin) =JeffH
Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan
HTTPbis -08 drafts published Julian Reschke
Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke

Monday, 26 October 2009

Fwd: I-D Action:draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery-04.txt Mark Nottingham
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 25 October 2009

Re: Multi-server HTTP Micah Cowan

Saturday, 24 October 2009

Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Thomas Broyer
Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Sylvain Hellegouarch

Friday, 23 October 2009

Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Thomas Broyer
Nov 2nd - Social Web Camp in Santa Clara Story Henry
Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Sylvain Hellegouarch

Thursday, 22 October 2009

Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jamie Lokier

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 20 October 2009

Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jim Gettys
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Julian Reschke
RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Roy T. Fielding
RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 19 October 2009

Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Mark Nottingham
Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Mark Nottingham
Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jim Gettys
Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Julian Reschke
[OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Lisa Dusseault
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jim Gettys
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
#131: Connection limits (proposal) Mark Nottingham

Friday, 16 October 2009

Issue 123, was: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-00.txt Julian Reschke
weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Julian Reschke

Thursday, 15 October 2009

Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Mark Nottingham
RE: Which status codes are cacheable? Brian Smith
Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan
Re: Issue 196, was: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Mark Nottingham
Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue 188, was: Content/Transfer-Codings organization/IANA considerations (issue 143, 188, 189) Mark Nottingham
FYI: draft-wing-http-new-tech Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 14 October 2009

RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Nicolas Alvarez
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Yves Lafon
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Yves Lafon
Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham
#29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Adrien de Croy
RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
Re: Which status codes are cacheable? Mark Nottingham
Re: #169: private and no-cache CC directives w/ header args Mark Nottingham
Re: #173: CR and LF in chunk extension values Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 13 October 2009

What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
Which status codes are cacheable? Brian Smith

Monday, 12 October 2009

Re: cache freshness / age calcs Mark Nottingham
Re: cache freshness / age calcs Nicolas Alvarez
cache freshness / age calcs Adrien de Croy

Sunday, 11 October 2009

Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-05.txt Julian Reschke

Friday, 9 October 2009

Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
Re: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update-00 open issues Anthony Bryan
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-wing-behave-http-ip-address-literals-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 8 October 2009

Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Adrien de Croy
Issue 196, was: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Julian Reschke
Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
RE: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Brian Smith
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Yves Lafon
RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
RE: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Brian Smith
RE: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Brian Smith
RE: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Brian Smith
#178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Roy T. Fielding
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
Re: #184: HTTP/0.9 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 7 October 2009

Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Mark Nottingham
Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Adrien de Croy
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Adrien de Croy
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
RE: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Brian Smith
Re: header parsing, trailing OWS David Morris
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] Julian Reschke
Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
Re: #173: CR and LF in chunk extension values Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 6 October 2009

draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update-00 open issues Alfred Hönes

Wednesday, 7 October 2009

Re: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update-00 open issues Anthony Bryan

Tuesday, 6 October 2009

Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Roy T. Fielding
Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Lisa Dusseault
Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Nicolas Alvarez
Review of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Guidelines Francois Daoust
Re: ambiguous ABNF in RFC 2231 (and friends) Julian Reschke
RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Julian Reschke
Re: #167: Content-Location on 304 responses Mark Nottingham
Re: [#54] 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mark Nottingham
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Roy T. Fielding
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham
Re: #173: CR and LF in chunk extension values Mark Nottingham
Re: [httpbis] #81: Content Negotiation for media types Mark Nottingham
Re: Empty host in 'http' scheme [#159] Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue 194: restricting allowed characters in quoted-pair Mark Nottingham
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
Re: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Mark Nottingham
Re: ambiguous ABNF in RFC 2231 (and friends) Martin J. Dürst

Monday, 5 October 2009

ambiguous ABNF in RFC 2231 (and friends) Julian Reschke

Sunday, 4 October 2009

Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-04.txt Julian Reschke
Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan

Saturday, 3 October 2009

Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-03.txt Julian Reschke
RE: realms Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
Re: Multi-server HTTP Sander Steffann

Friday, 2 October 2009

Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
Re: CSP spec vs listed-type headers Thomas Broyer
CSP spec vs listed-type headers Julian Reschke
RE: Multi-server HTTP Ford, Alan

Thursday, 1 October 2009

Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Lisa Dusseault
Re: Header encoding (per RFC2231), was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Ian Hickson

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 December 2009 23:01:56 UTC