Appropriate response code if server wants to enforce conditional PUT/DELETE? Jan Algermissen (Monday, 29 June)
Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham (Monday, 29 June)
- Re: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: Content-MD5 and partial responses Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: Content-MD5 and partial responses Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 30 June)
The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin) Adam Barth (Sunday, 28 June)
Fwd: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses [#174] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
RED: a tool for examining HTTP resources Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: RED: a tool for examining HTTP resources Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
Re: Review of Content-Encoding: value token Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 June)
Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Adam Barth (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Adam Barth (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Adam Barth (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Adam Barth (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
FYI: Stockholm meeting slot Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 21 June)
304 reponse with unrecognised ETag Adrien de Croy (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: 304 reponse with unrecognised ETag Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 June)
draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Michael Burrows (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Michael Burrows (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Phil Archer (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Michael Burrows (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Phil Archer (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Michael Burrows (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Phil Archer (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Michael Burrows (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation Phil Archer (Tuesday, 23 June)
CR and LF in chunk extension values Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: CR and LF in chunk extension values Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: CR and LF in chunk extension values Jamie Lokier (Friday, 26 June)
chunking without chunking Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: chunking without chunking (MSIE8 and Chrome issues?) Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: chunking without chunking Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header David Morris (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Daniel Stenberg (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
FYI: HTTPbis Tweets Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 16 June)
Review of new HTTPbis text for 303 See Other Jonathan Rees (Monday, 15 June)
#94 (Reason-Phrase BNF) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 13 June)
10 years Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: 10 years Julian Reschke (Saturday, 13 June)
PATCH and ETags Pablo Castro (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: PATCH and ETags Julian Reschke (Saturday, 13 June)
non CHAR characters in headers Adrien de Croy (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: non CHAR characters in headers Martin J. Dürst (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: non CHAR characters in headers Julian Reschke (Friday, 12 June)
Fwd: [hybi] draft-loreto-http-bidirectional Salvatore Loreto (Thursday, 11 June)
How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Robert de Wilde (Thursday, 11 June)
- Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Robert de Wilde (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Robert de Wilde (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Thomas Broyer (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Robert de Wilde (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Robert de Wilde (Thursday, 11 June)
- Add: Re: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Robert de Wilde (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Thomas Broyer (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Robert de Wilde (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 11 June)
HTTP Batch Request Draft James M Snell (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft Daniel Stenberg (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft James M Snell (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft James M Snell (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft James M Snell (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft Patrick McManus (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft James M Snell (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft James M Snell (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft Daniel Stenberg (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 June)
Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 10 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 9 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 11 June)
- Requests that do now allow bodies (do they exist?), was: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Requests that do now allow bodies (do they exist?), was: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Javier Godoy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 10 June)
httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Jamie Lokier (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Bil Corry (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 28 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 28 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Bil Corry (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 28 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive David Morris (Monday, 29 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 28 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 28 June)
- Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive Adrien de Croy (Monday, 29 June)
updating headers with 304 responses Adrien de Croy (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: updating headers with 304 responses Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 5 June)
#172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 June)
IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Alexey Melnikov (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 June)
- Proposed Erratum for RFC 2817, was: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Proposed Erratum for RFC 2817, was: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Alexey Melnikov (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 June)
- Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 June)
Upcoming meetings (Stockholm and Hiroshima) Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Revised: Upcoming meetings (Stockholm and Hiroshima) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 June)
Scope of redirection Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
Is OPTIONS Safe? Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? John Kemp (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 June)
- Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 13 June)
- Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
Vary: Cookie Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Vary: Cookie Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Vary: Cookie Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Vary: Cookie Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 3 June)
absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. David Morris (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. David Morris (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. David Morris (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. David Morris (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 2 June)
Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 2 June)
Sending Referer [#144] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 June)
- PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] Julian Reschke (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Sending Referer [#144] Adam Barth (Friday, 12 June)
Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 June)
- RE: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Brian Smith (Monday, 1 June)
- RE: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Saturday, 13 June)
- RE: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Baker (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Baker (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 David Morris (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adrien de Croy (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adrien de Croy (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Werner Baumann (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 David Morris (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Saturday, 13 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Ian Hickson (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 14 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Baker (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Baker (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Baker (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 William A. Rowe, Jr. (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 6 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 David Morris (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 7 June)
- PROPOSAL: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 13 June)
RE: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Larry Masinter (Sunday, 31 May)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth (Sunday, 31 May)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Robert O'Callahan (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jamie Lokier (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Robert O'Callahan (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jamie Lokier (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Robert O'Callahan (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Robert O'Callahan (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jamie Lokier (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jamie Lokier (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Simon Pieters (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Simon Pieters (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Robert O'Callahan (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing David Singer (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Joe D Williams (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Monday, 1 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 30 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing David Singer (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Robert O'Callahan (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Shane McCarron (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Dave Singer (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Shane McCarron (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Joe D Williams (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Joe D Williams (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Joe D Williams (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Joe D Williams (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Joe D Williams (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Shane McCarron (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Dave Singer (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Robert O'Callahan (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing David Singer (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing David Singer (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing David Singer (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Joe D Williams (Friday, 19 June)
FYI: CORS review Mark Nottingham (Friday, 29 May)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Thursday, 28 May)
408 Timeout details Robert Brewer (Wednesday, 27 May)
relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
MS IE protocol compatibility leads? William A. Rowe, Jr. (Tuesday, 26 May)
draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 26 May)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 7 June)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Thomas Broyer (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 2 June)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Brian Smith (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Thomas Broyer (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 David Morris (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: Cache-Control private="...", no-cache="..." (was RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06) Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 27 May)
- RE: Cache-Control private="...", no-cache="..." (was RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06) Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 May)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 7 June)
BNF for Cache-Control Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 24 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Julian Reschke (Sunday, 24 May)
- RE: BNF for Cache-Control Brian Smith (Sunday, 24 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Adrien de Croy (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Julian Reschke (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Adrien de Croy (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Julian Reschke (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Adrien de Croy (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Julian Reschke (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Adrien de Croy (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: BNF for Cache-Control Julian Reschke (Monday, 25 May)
querystring part of cache key Adrien de Croy (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Jamie Lokier (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key David Morris (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Adrian Chadd (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Jamie Lokier (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Adrian Chadd (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Jamie Lokier (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Jamie Lokier (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Adrien de Croy (Saturday, 23 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key Adrian Chadd (Friday, 22 May)
- Re: querystring part of cache key David Morris (Friday, 22 May)
12.2. Agent-driven negotiation Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 21 May)
- Re: 12.2. Agent-driven negotiation Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 May)
- Re: 12.2. Agent-driven negotiation Adrien de Croy (Friday, 22 May)
Use of extension-header in entity-header Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 20 May)
- RE: Use of extension-header in entity-header Brian Smith (Wednesday, 20 May)
- Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 20 May)
- RE: Use of extension-header in entity-header Brian Smith (Wednesday, 20 May)
- Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 21 May)
- RE: Use of extension-header in entity-header Brian Smith (Wednesday, 20 May)
- Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 May)
- RE: Use of extension-header in entity-header Brian Smith (Thursday, 21 May)
- Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 20 May)
- Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 May)
Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Sunday, 17 May)
- RE: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Brian Smith (Sunday, 17 May)
- Re: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 18 May)
- RE: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Brian Smith (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 18 May)
- RE: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Brian Smith (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 18 May)
- RE: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Brian Smith (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 18 May)
Statuscodes Stefan Tilkov (Friday, 8 May)
- Issue 164, was: Statuscodes Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 164, was: Statuscodes David Morris (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 164, was: Statuscodes Julian Reschke (Saturday, 9 May)
- Re: Issue 164, was: Statuscodes David Morris (Friday, 8 May)
#110: how to determine what entity a response carries Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Brian Smith (Wednesday, 6 May)
Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Julian Reschke (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: Issue 80 & 79, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 6 May)
Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 7 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers David Morris (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers David Morris (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers David Morris (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Julian Reschke (Thursday, 7 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Julian Reschke (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Julian Reschke (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 7 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Friday, 8 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 8 May)
CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Jamie Lokier (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adam Barth (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Jamie Lokier (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Monday, 18 May)
- TCP half-close behaviour Jamie Lokier (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Patrick McManus (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: CONNECT command with message body Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 5 May)
Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 3 May)
- Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Sunday, 3 May)
- Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Geoffrey Sneddon (Monday, 4 May)
- OT: Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 25 May)
- Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Geoffrey Sneddon (Monday, 4 May)
- RE: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Sunday, 3 May)
- Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Monday, 4 May)
- Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Thursday, 7 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Geoffrey Sneddon (Friday, 8 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 11 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Monday, 11 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Monday, 11 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Monday, 11 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Sunday, 17 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Monday, 18 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Dan Winship (Monday, 18 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Monday, 18 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 19 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 19 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Tuesday, 19 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates David Morris (Tuesday, 19 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Geoffrey Sneddon (Friday, 8 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Daniel Stenberg (Sunday, 17 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Sunday, 17 May)
- Issue 165, was: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 19 May)
- RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Brian Smith (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 May)
- Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates Julian Reschke (Sunday, 10 May)
Behaviour with malformed headers Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 3 May)
- Re: Behaviour with malformed headers Julian Reschke (Sunday, 3 May)
iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted Roger Pantos (Friday, 1 May)
- Re: iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted Vitaly Sharovatov (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted David Singer (Wednesday, 13 May)
Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Thomas Nordin (Thursday, 30 April)
- Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Thursday, 30 April)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Friday, 1 May)
- RE: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Brian Smith (Saturday, 2 May)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 May)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 May)
- RE: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Brian Smith (Sunday, 3 May)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Sunday, 3 May)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Sunday, 3 May)
- nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 4 May)
- Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 4 May)
- Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 4 May)
- Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] David Morris (Monday, 4 May)
- Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 5 May)
- RE: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] Brian Smith (Tuesday, 5 May)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Sunday, 3 May)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 May)
- RE: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Brian Smith (Saturday, 2 May)
- Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment Julian Reschke (Friday, 1 May)
Re: [rest-discuss] mnot on HTTPbis Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 22 April)
URI/IRI revisions (was Re: Minutes from informal IETF/W3C meeting about HTML5 work) Alexey Melnikov (Friday, 17 April)
Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Jonathan Rees (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Sean B. Palmer (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Jonathan Rees (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 17 April)
Closing #85: Custom ranges Mark Nottingham (Friday, 17 April)
Link Relations and languages Noah Slater (Thursday, 16 April)
- Re: Link Relations and languages Thomas Broyer (Thursday, 16 April)
- Re: Link Relations and languages Noah Slater (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: combining authenticated and anonymous access Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: Definition of 'resource' not consistent with RFC 3986 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 16 April)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Thursday, 16 April)
- RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Brian Smith (Thursday, 16 April)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Mark Nottingham (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Mark Nottingham (Friday, 1 May)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Friday, 1 May)
- RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Brian Smith (Friday, 1 May)
- RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length David Morris (Friday, 1 May)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Friday, 1 May)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Friday, 1 May)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Mark Nottingham (Friday, 1 May)
- RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Brian Smith (Saturday, 2 May)
- RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Brian Smith (Saturday, 2 May)
- Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 May)
- Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 6 May)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Mark Nottingham (Friday, 1 May)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke (Friday, 17 April)
- Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Mark Nottingham (Friday, 17 April)
- RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Brian Smith (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: HTTP 301 responses for POST Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: Retry-After header on 20X response -- HTTP/1.1 spec extension? Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: Empty host in 'http' scheme [#159] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 15 April)
IAT 2009 - Call for Papers - Extended Deadline wiiat@wi-consortium.org (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: PATCH draft Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PATCH draft Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: Keep-alive header in RFC2616 [#158] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 David Morris (Wednesday, 8 April)
- RE: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 Brian Smith (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 Mark Baker (Wednesday, 8 April)
- RE: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 David Morris (Wednesday, 8 April)
- RE: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 Brian Smith (Wednesday, 8 April)
[link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Phil Archer (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Phil Archer (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Eran Hammer-Lahav (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Eran Hammer-Lahav (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Eran Hammer-Lahav (Thursday, 9 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Phil Archer (Thursday, 9 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Phil Archer (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
Draft minutes for IETF74 Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
Closing #90: multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Closing #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: URI handling for Location Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 7 April)
- RE: URI handling for Location Brian Smith (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Daniel Stenberg (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: URI handling for Location Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location David Morris (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 7 April)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Brian Smith (Wednesday, 8 April)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 8 April)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Brian Smith (Wednesday, 8 April)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Brian Smith (Wednesday, 6 May)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Brian Smith (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 7 April)
Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Lisa Dusseault (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Lisa Dusseault (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Saturday, 30 May)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Saturday, 30 May)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Ian Hickson (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Martin J. Dürst (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Saturday, 30 May)
- allowing sniffed type list to be extensible? No. Larry Masinter (Sunday, 31 May)
- Re: allowing sniffed type list to be extensible? No. Adam Barth (Sunday, 31 May)
- Re: allowing sniffed type list to be extensible? No. Adam Barth (Friday, 5 June)
- allowing sniffed type list to be extensible? No. Larry Masinter (Sunday, 31 May)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adrien de Croy (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Daniel Stenberg (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Michaeljohn Clement (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adrien de Croy (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Bill McQuillan (Tuesday, 7 April)
- RE: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Blake Frantz (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adrien de Croy (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Daniel Stenberg (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Monday, 6 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Martin J. Dürst (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Saturday, 30 May)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 Lisa Dusseault (Monday, 6 April)
Re: p6-caching: commentary from -05 to -06 Yves Lafon (Monday, 6 April)
- Closing #138: The role of Warning and Semantic Transparency in Caching Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
Closing #83: OPTIONS * and proxies Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 April)
Closing #77: Line folding Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 April)
Closing #111: Use of TEXT Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 April)
Closing #74: Character Encodings in TEXT Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 April)
Closing #63: RFC2047 encoded words Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 April)
Closing #30: Header LWS Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 April)
Soliciting reviews for Cross-Origin Resource Sharing Mark Nottingham (Monday, 6 April)
Re: Referer URI MUST NOT include a fragment Tyler Close (Sunday, 5 April)
Request for Review: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing Doug Schepers (Friday, 3 April)
Re: case-sensitivity of weakness indicator Julian Reschke (Thursday, 2 April)
- Issue 153, was: case-sensitivity of weakness indicator Julian Reschke (Friday, 3 April)
HTTP pipelining - indirect security implications Amit Klein (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: HTTP pipelining - indirect security implications Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding leighton@mail.eecis.udel.edu (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding leighton@mail.eecis.udel.edu (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Fred Baker (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Fred Baker (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding leighton@mail.eecis.udel.edu (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 25 June)
Re: NEW ISSUE: isolate TCP-specific aspects of HTTP Salvatore Loreto (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: isolate TCP-specific aspects of HTTP Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 4 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: isolate TCP-specific aspects of HTTP Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 1 April)
- RE: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 Steingruebl, Andy (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 4 April)
- RE: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 Preethi Natarajan (prenatar) (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 4 April)
- Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 Salvatore Loreto (Sunday, 5 April)
- Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: Minutes from informal IETF/W3C meeting about HTML5 work Martin J. Dürst (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: Minutes from informal IETF/W3C meeting about HTML5 work Alexey Melnikov (Friday, 17 April)
Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Mark Baker (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Barry Leiba (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Bil Corry (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing David Morris (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Bil Corry (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Mark Baker (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Mark Baker (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Mark Baker (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Mark Baker (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Mark Baker (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Shane McCarron (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Ian Hickson (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adrien de Croy (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Ian Hickson (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Julian Reschke (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Ian Hickson (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Friday, 3 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Daniel Stenberg (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 2 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing Adam Barth (Wednesday, 1 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) Adam Barth (Tuesday, 7 April)
- PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adam Barth (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 8 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 9 April)
- RE: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Brian Smith (Thursday, 9 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 9 April)
- RE: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Brian Smith (Thursday, 9 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 9 April)
- RE: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Brian Smith (Saturday, 11 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 12 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 9 April)
- Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 9 April)
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009 23:53:39 UTC