ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2008 by date

Tuesday, 30 December 2008

Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-01.txt Julian Reschke

Friday, 26 December 2008

Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Jamie Lokier
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Jamie Lokier

Wednesday, 24 December 2008

Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length David Morris
Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Julian Reschke
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Julian Reschke
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 23 December 2008

Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Jeff Walden
Re: HTTP 301 responses for POST Bjoern Hoehrmann
RE: HTTP 301 responses for POST Robert Brewer
Re: HTTP 301 responses for POST Cyrus Daboo
Re: Retry-After header on 20X response -- HTTP/1.1 spec extension? Bryce Nesbitt
Re: HTTP 301 responses for POST Julian Reschke
Re: Retry-After header on 20X response -- HTTP/1.1 spec extension? Adrien de Croy
RE: HTTP 301 responses for POST Daniel Stenberg
Retry-After header on 20X response -- HTTP/1.1 spec extension? Bryce Nesbitt
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Jeff Walden

Monday, 22 December 2008

Re: Updated Patch Cyrus Daboo
Re: Updated Patch Julian Reschke
Re: Updated Patch Lisa Dusseault
Re: Updated Patch Julian Reschke
RE: HTTP 301 responses for POST Eric Lawrence

Sunday, 21 December 2008

Re: Updated Patch Lisa Dusseault

Friday, 19 December 2008

Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Martin Duerst

Sunday, 21 December 2008

Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions David Morris
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Jamie Lokier

Friday, 19 December 2008

Re: HTTP 301 responses for POST Daniel Stenberg
HTTP 301 responses for POST Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

Thursday, 18 December 2008

Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Julian Reschke
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Jeff Walden
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Julian Reschke
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length David Morris
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions David Morris
Re: Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Julian Reschke
Leading zeroes in 1*DIGIT productions Jeff Walden
Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length Jeff Walden

Wednesday, 17 December 2008

Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Bil Corry
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Bil Corry

Monday, 15 December 2008

Re: Removing multipart/byteranges as a message delimiter -- implementation survey [#90] Dan Winship
Date header in cached responses Adrien de Croy

Sunday, 14 December 2008

Re: Removing multipart/byteranges as a message delimiter -- implementation survey [#90] Mark Nottingham
Re: Removing multipart/byteranges as a message delimiter -- implementation survey [#90] Jamie Lokier

Saturday, 13 December 2008

RE: Use of the "Stale" flag in the WWW-Authenticate header lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com

Friday, 12 December 2008

RE: Use of the "Stale" flag in the WWW-Authenticate header Paul Leach
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Bil Corry
Re: RFC 3143 Yves Lafon
Re: RFC 3143 Julian Reschke
Re: RFC 3143 Mark Nottingham
Removing multipart/byteranges as a message delimiter -- implementation survey [#90] Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 11 December 2008

Re: [rest-discuss] MIME properties instead + Subbu Allamaraju
Re: Use of the "Stale" flag in the WWW-Authenticate header Thomas Broyer
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Jamie Lokier
RE: Use of the "Stale" flag in the WWW-Authenticate header lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com
RFC 3143 Julian Reschke
Re: RFC2231 encoding in HTTP: whitespace handling Julian Reschke
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Dan Winship
Re: [whatwg] Solving the login/logout problem in HTML Thomas Broyer
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Roy T. Fielding
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Roy T. Fielding
Re: link relationship registration Mark Nottingham
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 10 December 2008

Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Roy T. Fielding
Re: link relationship registration Henri Sivonen
Re: link relationship registration Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: link relationship registration Henri Sivonen
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration Anne van Kesteren
Re: link relationship registration Phil Archer
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Re: link relationship registration Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Yves Lafon
Re: link relationship registration Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration Anne van Kesteren
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Phil Archer
Re: link relationship registration Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration Anne van Kesteren
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Phil Archer
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Julian Reschke
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Martin Duerst
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Mark Nottingham
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 9 December 2008

Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Roy T. Fielding
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Yves Lafon
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 8 December 2008

Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Roy T. Fielding
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Drummond Reed

Saturday, 6 December 2008

Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Ian Hickson
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Phil Archer
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Roy T. Fielding
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Drummond Reed
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Drummond Reed
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Ian Hickson

Friday, 5 December 2008

Googles ResumableHttpRequestsProposal vs Microsoft BITS Julian Reschke
RE: Use of the "Stale" flag in the WWW-Authenticate header lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 4 December 2008

RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 John Kemp
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Drummond Reed
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 3 December 2008

Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Subbu Allamaraju
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Use of the "Stale" flag in the WWW-Authenticate header lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Phil Archer
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Phil Archer
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Remove elfius@gmail.com from the list, please Elfius
RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Drummond Reed
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 David Morris
Re: Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 2 December 2008

Re: combining authenticated and anonymous access Yves Lafon
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
RE: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Drummond Reed
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Teo Hui Ming
Re: Cache key history Roy T. Fielding
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Mark Nottingham
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 1 December 2008

Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03] Dan Connolly
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Paul Denning
Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Julian Reschke
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Alan Ruttenberg
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03 Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 29 November 2008

Re: Content type for /site-meta (or HTTP header fragment format) Mark Nottingham
FYI: draft-nottingham-http-stale-controls-00 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 28 November 2008

Re: Content type for /site-meta (or HTTP header fragment format) Phil Archer
Cache key history Mark Nottingham
Content type for /site-meta (or HTTP header fragment format) Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: combining authenticated and anonymous access Julian Reschke
Re: combining authenticated and anonymous access Yves Lafon
Re: combining authenticated and anonymous access Julian Reschke

Thursday, 27 November 2008

Re: combining authenticated and anonymous access Yves Lafon
RE: combining authenticated and anonymous access Thomas Maslen
Are accept-extensions used in practice? Julian Reschke
combining authenticated and anonymous access Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 26 November 2008

Comment on issue 13 Felix Sasaki

Monday, 24 November 2008

The demise of the Netscape Doc??? Here is working linkRe: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification David Morris
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Dan Winship

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Jamie Lokier
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification David Morris

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Daniel Stenberg

Friday, 21 November 2008

Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Bil Corry
Re: HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Dan Winship

Thursday, 20 November 2008

HTTPOnly Cookies Specification Bil Corry
Re: draft -05 and current status Julian Reschke
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Brian Smith

Wednesday, 19 November 2008

Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Roy T. Fielding
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching (proposal) Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching (proposal) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching (proposal) Jamie Lokier
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Yves Lafon
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Adrien de Croy

Tuesday, 18 November 2008

RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Brian Smith
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Roy T. Fielding
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching (proposal) Brian Smith
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Werner Baumann
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Julian Reschke
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Werner Baumann
Re: draft -05 and current status David Morris
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Yves Lafon
Re: draft -05 and current status Julian Reschke
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 17 November 2008

Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 18 November 2008

RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Brian Smith
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Brian Smith
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Robert Siemer

Monday, 17 November 2008

Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: draft -05 and current status David Morris
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Werner Baumann
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Brian Smith
RE: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Brian Smith
draft -05 and current status Mark Nottingham
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Robert Siemer
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Jamie Lokier
Re: Proposal for issue #101 (strong/weak validators). Jamie Lokier
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Jamie Lokier

Sunday, 16 November 2008

Re: NEW ISSUE: The role of Warning and Semantic Transparency in Caching David Morris
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Robert Siemer

Saturday, 15 November 2008

Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: The role of Warning and Semantic Transparency in Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: Proposal for issue #101 (strong/weak validators). Henrik Nordstrom
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Proposal for issue #101 (strong/weak validators). Jamie Lokier
NEW ISSUE: Methods and Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham
NEW ISSUE: The role of Warning and Semantic Transparency in Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: Proposal for issue #101 (strong/weak validators). Henrik Nordstrom

Friday, 14 November 2008

Re: Proposal for issue #101 (strong/weak validators). Yves Lafon
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Amit Klein
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Amit Klein
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Jamie Lokier
Re: Proposal for issue #101 (strong/weak validators). Werner Baumann
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Henrik Nordstrom
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom
Proposal for issue #101 (strong/weak validators). Yves Lafon
Re: #90: multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham
RE: #90: multipart/byteranges Robert Brewer
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Jamie Lokier
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Jamie Lokier
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de
RE: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Robert Brewer
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Daniel Stenberg
RE: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Brian Smith
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Jamie Lokier
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Alexey Melnikov
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Jamie Lokier
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Mark Nottingham
Re: Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Jamie Lokier
Re: [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * David Morris
Re: [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Mark Nottingham
Re: [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Jamie Lokier
Re: [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Mark Nottingham
#90: multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham
Status of issue #30 (Implied LWS) Mark Nottingham
PROPOSAL: #111 (Use of TEXT) Mark Nottingham
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Adrien de Croy

Tuesday, 11 November 2008

Re: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-cookie-v2-03.txt Amit Klein

Sunday, 9 November 2008

Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-cookie-v2-03.txt Amit Klein
Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-cookie-v2-03.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-cookie-v2-03.txt Amit Klein

Thursday, 6 November 2008

RE: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Greg Dean
(Small) progress on ABNF conversion (issue 36) Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 5 November 2008

Re: proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*) Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 4 November 2008

Re: proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*) Julian Reschke
RE: proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*) Brian Smith
Re: Issue 133, was: multipart/byteranges minimum number of parts Julian Reschke
Re: proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*) Julian Reschke
Re: proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*) Dan Winship
proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*) Julian Reschke

Monday, 3 November 2008

Fwd: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-cache-context-03.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-cookie-v2-03.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-dns-cookie-validate-04.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-pettersen-subtld-structure-04.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Re: Issue 133, was: multipart/byteranges minimum number of parts Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 28 October 2008

Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Daniel Stenberg
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 27 October 2008

HTTP over SCTP draft submitted Preethi Natarajan
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke

Friday, 24 October 2008

Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess

Saturday, 25 October 2008

RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Brian Smith

Friday, 24 October 2008

Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Henrik Nordstrom
RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Brian Smith
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Henrik Nordstrom
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Yves Lafon
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Etan Wexler

Thursday, 23 October 2008

Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Jamie Lokier
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Roy T. Fielding
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 22 October 2008

Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

New issue: redirected PUT, was: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Roy T. Fielding
RE: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Brian Smith
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Adrien de Croy
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Yves
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
RE: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Brian Smith
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Adrien de Croy
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding William A. Rowe, Jr.
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Adrien de Croy
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Adrien de Croy
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding William A. Rowe, Jr.
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding David Morris
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding William A. Rowe, Jr.
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 20 October 2008

Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Jamie Lokier
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
Re: estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Henrik Nordstrom
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Henrik Nordstrom
estimated Content-Length with chunked encoding Greg Dean
RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Brian Smith
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Henrik Nordstrom
RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Brian Smith
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Henrik Nordstrom
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Robert Brewer
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Helge Hess
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Henrik Nordstrom
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Henrik Nordstrom
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Brian Smith
Re: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke
RE: server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Brian Smith
server applying PUT to a resource other than the request-URI Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 14 October 2008

RE: Overlapping ranges Yves Lafon

Monday, 13 October 2008

RE: Overlapping ranges Brian Smith
Re: Overlapping ranges Yves Lafon
Re: must a partial response range be exact? A. Rothman
RE: must a partial response range be exact? Brian Smith

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Re: Overlapping ranges Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: must a partial response range be exact? Julian Reschke
RE: must a partial response range be exact? Brian Smith
Re: must a partial response range be exact? Julian Reschke

Saturday, 11 October 2008

Re: must a partial response range be exact? A. Rothman
Re: must a partial response range be exact? A. Rothman

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Re: must a partial response range be exact? David Morris

Saturday, 11 October 2008

Re: must a partial response range be exact? Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Overlapping ranges Julian Reschke
Re: must a partial response range be exact? Julian Reschke

Friday, 10 October 2008

RE: must a partial response range be exact? Brian Smith
Re: must a partial response range be exact? Henrik Nordstrom
Overlapping ranges V13
Re: must a partial response range be exact? Henrik Nordstrom

Thursday, 9 October 2008

Re: must a partial response range be exact? A. Rothman
Re: must a partial response range be exact? A. Rothman
Re: must a partial response range be exact? Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Issue 133, was: multipart/byteranges minimum number of parts Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 8 October 2008

Re: must a partial response range be exact? Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Issue 133, was: multipart/byteranges minimum number of parts Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 6 October 2008

OAuth authorization delegation protocol draft submitted Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Issue 133, was: multipart/byteranges minimum number of parts Julian Reschke

Friday, 3 October 2008

Re: iphone urls Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 2 October 2008

RE: iphone urls Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: iphone urls Julian Reschke
Re: must a partial response range be exact? A. Rothman
Re: iphone urls Stefan Eissing
Re: iphone urls Alan Ruttenberg
Re: iphone urls Mark Nottingham
iphone urls Stefan Eissing
Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham
Re: Status of Link header Mark Nottingham
Re: (issue 100) - security considerations Mark Nottingham
Re: minneapolis meeting plans Shane McCarron
Re: minneapolis meeting plans Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 1 October 2008

Re: minneapolis meeting plans Julian Reschke
minneapolis meeting plans David Morris
Re: must a partial response range be exact? Julian Reschke
Issue 133, was: multipart/byteranges minimum number of parts Julian Reschke

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 December 2008 20:52:34 UTC