NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Werner Baumann (Saturday, 29 December)
Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Martin Duerst (Wednesday, 26 December)
- Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Frank Ellermann (Friday, 28 December)
Re: Unknown text/* subtypes (was: Request for review of Turtle (an RDFserialization) media type: text/turtle) Martin Duerst (Wednesday, 26 December)
- Re: Re: Unknown text/* subtypes (was: Request for review of Turtle (an RDFserialization) media type: text/turtle) Eric Prud'hommeaux (Wednesday, 26 December)
i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 23 December)
- Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Sunday, 23 December)
- Re: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Javier Godoy (Sunday, 23 December)
- Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 27 December)
i93: Repeating Single-value headers Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 23 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Robert Siemer (Sunday, 23 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Julian Reschke (Sunday, 23 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 25 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Saturday, 29 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Julian Reschke (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Julian Reschke (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Julian Reschke (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Friday, 28 December)
- Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Julian Reschke (Friday, 28 December)
Issues List -- new location Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 22 December)
- Re: Issues List -- new location Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 23 December)
Draft minutes for Vancouver Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 22 December)
WG drafts for partitioned 2616bis Mark Nottingham (Friday, 21 December)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 21 December)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 21 December)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 21 December)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 21 December)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 21 December)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 21 December)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 21 December)
i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Lisa Dusseault (Thursday, 13 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections David Morris (Thursday, 13 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 13 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Stewart Brodie (Thursday, 13 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 13 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 13 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Yves Lafon (Thursday, 13 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 December)
- RE: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Paul Leach (Friday, 14 December)
- Re: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Mark Nottingham (Friday, 21 December)
- RE: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Larry Masinter (Friday, 21 December)
- RE: i15: How to tell if a client does not support persistent connections Paul Leach (Friday, 14 December)
Content-Location as Base URI Franklin Tse (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: Content-Location as Base URI Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: Content-Location as Base URI L. David Baron (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: Content-Location as Base URI Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: Content-Location as Base URI Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: Content-Location as Base URI L. David Baron (Monday, 10 December)
Connection: "close" — Case sensitive or not? Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 9 December)
- Re: Connection: "close" — Case sensitive or not? Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 10 December)
conditional request vs GET (new issue?) Julian Reschke (Sunday, 9 December)
[Fwd: Working Group Last Call: draft-melnikov-digest-to-historic-00.txt] Alexey Melnikov (Thursday, 6 December)
- Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-melnikov-digest-to-historic-00.txt Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 6 December)
moving forward with partitioned drafts Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 5 December)
Using server-driven negotiation Andrew Daviel (Tuesday, 4 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 4 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Andrew Daviel (Wednesday, 5 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 5 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Andrew Daviel (Wednesday, 5 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Mark Baker (Wednesday, 5 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 6 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Subbu Allamaraju (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Robert Siemer (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Subbu Allamaraju (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Andrew Daviel (Wednesday, 12 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Subbu Allamaraju (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Subbu Allamaraju (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Robert Siemer (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Using server-driven negotiation Subbu Allamaraju (Saturday, 8 December)
[NEW ISSUE] Content-Length is a hop-to-hop header Yutaka OIWA (Tuesday, 4 December)
(Re: issue #93) Duplicated headers and security vulnerabilities Yutaka OIWA (Tuesday, 4 December)
[NEW ISSUE] Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding: security implications Yutaka OIWA (Tuesday, 4 December)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding: security implications Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 4 December)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding: security implications Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 4 December)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding: security implications Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 6 December)
Agenda updated Mark Nottingham (Friday, 30 November)
Request methods that allow an entity-body Scott Nichol (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Mark Baker (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body David Morris (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Adrien de Croy (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Scott Nichol (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Mark Baker (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body [i19] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body [i19] Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 2 December)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body [i19] Mark Baker (Sunday, 2 December)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body [i19] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Robert Siemer (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Scott Nichol (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body Adrien de Croy (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body David Morris (Friday, 30 November)
i88: 205 Bodies Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 November)
Objectives of RFC2616bis? Robert Siemer (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: Objectives of RFC2616bis? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 28 November)
NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Dan Winship (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Dan Winship (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 27 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Eric Lawrence (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Dan Winship (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Robert Siemer (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Robert Siemer (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Robert Siemer (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Adrien de Croy (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Dan Winship (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 27 November)
Request for review on Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 26 November)
I18N and basic authentication Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 November)
Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Frank Ellermann (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Julian Reschke (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Alexey Melnikov (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Stephane Bortzmeyer (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Julian Reschke (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Julian Reschke (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Stephane Bortzmeyer (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag" Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 November)
Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Julian Reschke (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Julian Reschke (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Julian Reschke (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Julian Reschke (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Frank Ellermann (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Julian Reschke (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Julian Reschke (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 November)
NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Mark Nottingham (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 23 November)
Preliminary agenda up Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: Preliminary agenda up Robert Sayre (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: Preliminary agenda up Mark Nottingham (Monday, 26 November)
- Re: Preliminary agenda up Robert Sayre (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: Preliminary agenda up Mark Nottingham (Monday, 26 November)
NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text David Morris (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text David Morris (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text David Morris (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 21 November)
NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Julian Reschke (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Javier Godoy (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Julian Reschke (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: empty Host header Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 November)
request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Alexey Melnikov (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Alexey Melnikov (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Julian Reschke (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Geoffrey Sneddon (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Alexey Melnikov (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: request for feedback: RFC2616 BNF name collisions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers David Morris (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Geoffrey Sneddon (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Geoffrey Sneddon (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 23 November)
NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 18 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 18 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Jamie Lokier (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Jamie Lokier (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Jamie Lokier (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 18 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Jamie Lokier (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: status of multipart/byteranges Jamie Lokier (Monday, 19 November)
- i90: status of multipart/byteranges Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 November)
Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement David Morris (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Julian Reschke (Friday, 16 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Frank Ellermann (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Julian Reschke (Monday, 19 November)
- References (was: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement) Frank Ellermann (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Frank Ellermann (Monday, 19 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Julian Reschke (Friday, 16 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Dave Kristol (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement David Morris (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 November)
Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 17 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: i37 - Vary and non-existant headers Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 15 November)
status on partitioned drafts Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: status on partitioned drafts Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: status on partitioned drafts Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Via MUST discussion [was: Re: status on partitioned drafts David Morris (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Via MUST discussion Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Via MUST discussion Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: Via MUST discussion Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: Via MUST discussion Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: Via MUST discussion Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: Via MUST discussion Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: status on partitioned drafts Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: status on partitioned drafts Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 22 November)
progress on BNF conversion Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 14 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Julian Reschke (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: progress on BNF conversion Frank Ellermann (Monday, 26 November)
- Vancouver agenda item BNF, was: progress on BNF conversion Julian Reschke (Friday, 30 November)
Re: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 13 November)
i70: cacheability of status 303 Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: cacheability of status 303 Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: i70: cacheability of status 303 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: i70: cacheability of status 303 Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 14 November)
i25 - Accept-Encoding BNF [was: Erratum in RFC 2616] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 13 November)
Accepting pre-existing errata resolutions Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: Accepting pre-existing errata resolutions Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 21 November)
Vancouver agenda topics Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: Vancouver agenda topics Julian Reschke (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: Vancouver agenda topics Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
- What to include into draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04, was: Vancouver agenda topics Julian Reschke (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: What to include into draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04, was: Vancouver agenda topics Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: What to include into draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04, was: Vancouver agenda topics Julian Reschke (Friday, 16 November)
- draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04 submitted, was: What to include into draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 18 November)
- Re: What to include into draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04, was: Vancouver agenda topics Julian Reschke (Friday, 16 November)
- Re: What to include into draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04, was: Vancouver agenda topics Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 November)
- What to include into draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-04, was: Vancouver agenda topics Julian Reschke (Thursday, 15 November)
- Re: Vancouver agenda topics Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
Editorial Nit: referring to status codes Julian Reschke (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: Editorial Nit: referring to status codes David Morris (Sunday, 4 November)
[i81] Content Negotiation for media types Javier Godoy (Saturday, 3 November)
- RE: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Larry Masinter (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Julian Reschke (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
- RE: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Mike Dierken (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Subbu Allamaraju (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: [i81] Content Negotiation for media types Julian Reschke (Sunday, 4 November)
- Creating a HTTP "protocol feature set" Larry Masinter (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: Creating a HTTP "protocol feature set" Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
Issue 27 (PUT Idempotency) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 3 November)
- Re: Issue 27 (PUT Idempotency) Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
Re: [i16] Remove 'identity' token references Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 3 November)
- Re: [i16] Remove 'identity' token references Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
[i47] inconsistency in date format explanation Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 3 November)
- Re: [i47] inconsistency in date format explanation Julian Reschke (Saturday, 3 November)
- Re: [i47] inconsistency in date format explanation Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [i47] inconsistency in date format explanation Frank Ellermann (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [i47] inconsistency in date format explanation Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 5 November)
draft-sayre-http-security-variance-00.txt, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Julian Reschke (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: draft-sayre-http-security-variance-00.txt, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre (Thursday, 8 November)
- Re: draft-sayre-http-security-variance-00.txt, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Alexey Melnikov (Sunday, 2 December)
NOTE WELL - contributions to this mailing list Mark Nottingham (Monday, 29 October)
HTTPBIS - getting started Mark Nottingham (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: HTTPBIS - getting started Justin Erenkrantz (Wednesday, 31 October)
- Re: HTTPBIS - getting started Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 31 October)
Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Julian Reschke (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Julian Reschke (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Julian Reschke (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Julian Reschke (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string David Morris (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Frank Ellermann (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Julian Reschke (Sunday, 28 October)
- Re: Semantic meaning of double quotation marks delimiting quoted-string Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 28 October)
Updated PATCH draft James M Snell (Saturday, 27 October)
- Re: Updated PATCH draft Subbu Allamaraju (Saturday, 8 December)
- Re: Updated PATCH draft Robert Siemer (Sunday, 9 December)
- Re: Updated PATCH draft Subbu Allamaraju (Sunday, 9 December)
- Re: Updated PATCH draft James M Snell (Sunday, 9 December)
- Re: Updated PATCH draft Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 9 December)
- Re: Updated PATCH draft Robert Siemer (Sunday, 9 December)
Re: does no-store request invalidate? Werner Baumann (Friday, 26 October)
- Re: does no-store request invalidate? Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 29 October)
WG Action: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis WG (httpbis) IESG Secretary (Tuesday, 23 October)
RFC2617: section reference erratum Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 October)
RFC 2616, partitioned Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 18 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 18 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Julian Reschke (Thursday, 18 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Julian Reschke (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 18 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 18 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Robert Sayre (Friday, 19 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Roy T. Fielding (Sunday, 21 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Mark Nottingham (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Jamie Lokier (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: RFC 2616, partitioned Roy T. Fielding (Sunday, 21 October)
Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Ian Hickson (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Ian Hickson (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Phil Archer (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Phil Archer (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 17 October)
[new issue] If(-None)-Match still refers to entity Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: [new issue] If(-None)-Match still refers to entity Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 16 October)
- i89: If(-None)-Match still refers to entity Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 28 November)
new issue: URI length limitations Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: new issue: URI length limitations Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 12 October)
Re: new issue: remove redundant MUST obey xrefs Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
Re: Custom Ranges Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
Re: NEW ISSUE: normative references Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
Re: semantic error in RFC 2616 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Coding vs ETags Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Coding vs ETags Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Coding vs ETags Julian Reschke (Friday, 12 October)
WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) IESG Secretary (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Ted Hardie (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Lisa Dusseault (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Paul Hoffman (Sunday, 14 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Frank Ellermann (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) James M Snell (Sunday, 14 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Lisa Dusseault (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Sam Hartman (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Sam Hartman (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 18 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Sam Hartman (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) James M Snell (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Lisa Dusseault (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) Mark Nottingham (Monday, 15 October)
status of delta compression (encoding) for HTTP servers/browsers? Andy King (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: status of delta compression (encoding) for HTTP servers/browsers? Eric Lawrence (Tuesday, 9 October)
NEW ISSUE: rel_path not used Julian Reschke (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: rel_path not used Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 8 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: rel_path not used Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
NEW ISSUE: NO default charset Martin Duerst (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: NO default charset Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: NO default charset Martin Duerst (Saturday, 6 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: NO default charset Julian Reschke (Saturday, 6 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: NO default charset Julian Reschke (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: NO default charset Asbjørn Ulsberg (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: NO default charset Martin Duerst (Saturday, 6 October)
Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 October)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Thursday, 4 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 16 October)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 16 October)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Thursday, 4 October)
Re: Status, Vancouver Justin Erenkrantz (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Julian Reschke (Saturday, 20 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Justin Erenkrantz (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Julian Reschke (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Julian Reschke (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Status, Vancouver Justin Erenkrantz (Wednesday, 24 October)
Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 October)
- [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 October)
- [new issue] Re: Proxying OPTIONS * Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 3 October)
RFC 2617 Authentication-Info BNF Tim Olsen (Monday, 1 October)
- RE: RFC 2617 Authentication-Info BNF Paul Leach (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: RFC 2617 Authentication-Info BNF Tim Olsen (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: RFC 2617 Authentication-Info BNF Paul Leach (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: RFC 2617 Authentication-Info BNF Tim Olsen (Tuesday, 2 October)
209 No Content vs. application/empty James M Snell (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: 209 No Content vs. application/empty Andreas Sewe (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: 209 No Content vs. application/empty Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: 209 No Content vs. application/empty James M Snell (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: 209 No Content vs. application/empty Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 1 October)
- revised draft-decroy-http-progress-03 Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: 209 No Content vs. application/empty James M Snell (Monday, 1 October)
Last message date: Saturday, 29 December 2007 16:57:55 UTC