Issue 1877

First of all, the doc states "Calculates the arc tangent of y / x, returning a value ranging from -π/2 to π/2." which should be "..from -π to π.", as is shown in the table.
Then, there are a couple of inconsistencies in the "Special Values" table:
"±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0" should be "±0.0 +0.0 ±0.0",
"<0.0 ±0.0 π/2" should be "<0.0 ±0.0 -π/2",
">0.0 ∞ ±0.0" should be "anything ∞ ±0.0",
">0.0 -∞ ±π" should be "anything -∞ ±π".

(In reply to comment #0)
> First of all, the doc states "Calculates the arc tangent of y / x, returning a
> value ranging from -π/2 to π/2." which should be "..from -π to π.", as is
> shown in the table.
> 
> Then, there are a couple of inconsistencies in the "Special Values" table:
> "±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0" should be "±0.0 +0.0 ±0.0",
> "<0.0 ±0.0 π/2" should be "<0.0 ±0.0 -π/2",
> ">0.0 ∞ ±0.0" should be "anything ∞ ±0.0",
> ">0.0 -∞ ±π" should be "anything -∞ ±π".
> 
You're correct for the first three, but not for the last two. atan2(NaN, inf) is NaN, not +-0. Also atan2(inf, inf) is pi/4.

I was using "anything" more like "anything, except values explicitely mentioned elsewhere in this table", as seems to be the case in the row "±∞ anything ±π/2", already present in the table.
Also "inf,inf" is explictely mentioned in the table, so was not meant by "anything". I agree that the word "anything" should be best avoided and replaced by "<>0" or something similarly D-like.

Bill Baxter wrote:
> d-bugmail@puremagic.com wrote:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1877
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Comment #1 from clugdbug@yahoo.com.au 2008年02月29日 02:15 -------
>> (In reply to comment #0)
>>> First of all, the doc states "Calculates the arc tangent of y / x, 
>>> returning a
>>> value ranging from -π/2 to π/2." which should be "..from -π to π.", 
>>> as is
>>> shown in the table.
>>>
>>> Then, there are a couple of inconsistencies in the "Special Values" 
>>> table:
>>> "±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0" should be "±0.0 +0.0 ±0.0",
>>> "<0.0 ±0.0 π/2" should be "<0.0 ±0.0 -π/2",
>>> ">0.0 ∞ ±0.0" should be "anything ∞ ±0.0",
>>> ">0.0 -∞ ±π" should be "anything -∞ ±π".
>>>
>>
>> You're correct for the first three, but not for the last two. 
>> atan2(NaN, inf)
>> is NaN, not +-0. Also atan2(inf, inf) is pi/4.
> 
> Who says the atan2(inf,inf) is pi/4? Is that an IEEE thing?
Yup.
For a sanity check, here's a link to the Java docs:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/Math.html#atan2(double,%20double)
> Seems odd since that's like saying atan(inf/inf), and inf/inf is NaN, 
> isn't it?
Yes, it's one of the strange IEEE results. There's a couple that are controversial.
> Put another way atan2(inf,inf)
> the limit of any atan2(k*x,x) as x gets big. Since k could be anything, 
> it seems strange for the value to suddenly change to pi/4 when x becomes 
> inf.
> 
> --bb

Fixed dmd 1.028 and 2.012