Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Mouse Gestures... one step forward, two steps back? #2005

BobSammers started this conversation in Feature Request
Discussion options

I recently moved from Vivaldi to Firefox. I installed Gesturefy because I really missed Vivaldi's native mouse gestures, but I haven't been able to get on with the fact that Gesturefy cannot access internal browser pages, such as the Start Page or settings because of Mozilla's restrictions on extensions.

I installed Floorp a few days ago, specifically to get native gestures back. Unfortunately, I have found the gestures to be not nearly as reliable as Gesturefy: they work maybe 50% of the time in Floorp, when the same one in Gesturefy in Firefox would be recognised without fail. (Larger gestures - much bigger than I would like to draw them - seem to work a bit better, but even then it isn't very different. I've tried adjusting the sensitivity slider but I don't see any real difference.)

I realise this is a recent addition and perhaps a work in progress, but why reinvent the wheel? Gesturefy works really well and is open source. Instead of writing a new algorithm, why not either incorporate the Gesturefy code for gesture recognition or even just incorporate the Gesturefy extension entirely, allowing it to see the pages that it cannot access in Firefox? I understand from the changelog that the plugin has had special treatment in the past, now unfortunately removed.

In other respects, I've enjoyed using Floorp (Floorp Start and Workspaces, for example) and I'd love to stick with it, but reliable mouse gestures is a deal-breaker for me. Having to redraw the same shape two or three times even though the trail on the screen looks pretty identifiable to me, is endlessly frustrating, especially when I know there is a tool that works much better waiting to be reused.

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 2 comments 2 replies

Comment options

The issue with mouse gesture recognition accuracy stems from the recent addition of diagonal gestures. I believe this will be improved through future adjustments.

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
Comment options

Thank you, I hope so. I still think pinching an already honed and battle-tested algorithm from an existing tool is likely to be the quickest and most reliable way to make it effective.

Comment options

I've just updated to the 12.2.1 release and discovered that things are much improved in this version (although still not quite as reliable as Gesturefy). Thank you for working on this.

One thing I would like to see that other recognition systems have is the ability to realise that at some point, recognition should be abandoned. If I make a mistake during a gesture in Gesturefy, I can just wiggle the mouse a bit and the command label disappears, meaning I can release the mouse button without any command being executed. In Floorp, I seem to be committed to executing something even if I've completely messed up the gesture.

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
Comment options

They continue to work on improving gesture recognition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /