-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
Mouse Gestures... one step forward, two steps back? #2005
-
I recently moved from Vivaldi to Firefox. I installed Gesturefy because I really missed Vivaldi's native mouse gestures, but I haven't been able to get on with the fact that Gesturefy cannot access internal browser pages, such as the Start Page or settings because of Mozilla's restrictions on extensions.
I installed Floorp a few days ago, specifically to get native gestures back. Unfortunately, I have found the gestures to be not nearly as reliable as Gesturefy: they work maybe 50% of the time in Floorp, when the same one in Gesturefy in Firefox would be recognised without fail. (Larger gestures - much bigger than I would like to draw them - seem to work a bit better, but even then it isn't very different. I've tried adjusting the sensitivity slider but I don't see any real difference.)
I realise this is a recent addition and perhaps a work in progress, but why reinvent the wheel? Gesturefy works really well and is open source. Instead of writing a new algorithm, why not either incorporate the Gesturefy code for gesture recognition or even just incorporate the Gesturefy extension entirely, allowing it to see the pages that it cannot access in Firefox? I understand from the changelog that the plugin has had special treatment in the past, now unfortunately removed.
In other respects, I've enjoyed using Floorp (Floorp Start and Workspaces, for example) and I'd love to stick with it, but reliable mouse gestures is a deal-breaker for me. Having to redraw the same shape two or three times even though the trail on the screen looks pretty identifiable to me, is endlessly frustrating, especially when I know there is a tool that works much better waiting to be reused.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
The issue with mouse gesture recognition accuracy stems from the recent addition of diagonal gestures. I believe this will be improved through future adjustments.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Thank you, I hope so. I still think pinching an already honed and battle-tested algorithm from an existing tool is likely to be the quickest and most reliable way to make it effective.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I've just updated to the 12.2.1 release and discovered that things are much improved in this version (although still not quite as reliable as Gesturefy). Thank you for working on this.
One thing I would like to see that other recognition systems have is the ability to realise that at some point, recognition should be abandoned. If I make a mistake during a gesture in Gesturefy, I can just wiggle the mouse a bit and the command label disappears, meaning I can release the mouse button without any command being executed. In Floorp, I seem to be committed to executing something even if I've completely messed up the gesture.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
They continue to work on improving gesture recognition.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.