← Discover a correlation

Small Image
Data source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

Issue:
Additional details:
Optional
Confirm you are a human:




Brown-Forman's stock price (BF.B) correlates with...

Variable Correlation Years Has img?
Popularity of the first name Beau r=0.98 21yrs Yes!
Renewable energy production in Australia r=0.98 20yrs No
Popularity of the first name Aspen r=0.98 21yrs No
The number of Breweries in the United States r=0.97 21yrs No



Brown-Forman's stock price (BF.B) also correlates with...

Variable Correlation Years Sys. Score
American cheese consumption r=0.95 20yrs 436
Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums r=0.95 21yrs 418
Gender pay gap in the U.S. r=0.95 20yrs 412
Google's Net Income r=0.97 19yrs 410
Food spending in Iowa r=0.97 19yrs 409
Number of internet users r=0.96 15yrs 408
Butter consumption r=0.93 20yrs 403
Milk-fat consumption r=0.93 20yrs 373
Hispanic cheese consumption r=0.93 20yrs 363
Grocery store spend in Iowa r=0.96 19yrs 288
Food spending in Maine r=0.95 19yrs 266
Food spending in Nebraska r=0.95 19yrs 256
Food spending in Wisconsin r=0.95 19yrs 226


Loading...!




<< Back to discover a correlation

You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.

I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
Error :(


AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /