This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 9;10(2):186.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020186.

Brucella: Reservoirs and Niches in Animals and Humans

Affiliations
Review

Brucella: Reservoirs and Niches in Animals and Humans

Gabriela González-Espinoza et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Brucella is an intracellular bacterium that causes abortion, reproduction failure in livestock and leads to a debilitating flu-like illness with serious chronic complications if untreated in humans. As a successful intracellular pathogen, Brucella has developed strategies to avoid recognition by the immune system of the host and promote its survival and replication. In vivo, Brucellae reside mostly within phagocytes and other cells including trophoblasts, where they establish a preferred replicative niche inside the endoplasmic reticulum. This process is central as it gives Brucella the ability to maintain replicating-surviving cycles for long periods of time, even at low bacterial numbers, in its cellular niches. In this review, we propose that Brucella takes advantage of the environment provided by the cellular niches in which it resides to generate reservoirs and disseminate to other organs. We will discuss how the favored cellular niches for Brucella infection in the host give rise to anatomical reservoirs that may lead to chronic infections or persistence in asymptomatic subjects, and which may be considered as a threat for further contamination. A special emphasis will be put on bone marrow, lymph nodes, reproductive and for the first time adipose tissues, as well as wildlife reservoirs.

Keywords: Brucella; chronic infection; persistence; replication niche; reservoir; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of Brucella’s cellular niches and reservoirs. The endoplasmic reticulum is the preferred intracellular niche for Brucella, but in some extravillous HLA-G+ trophoblasts, B. abortus and B. suis are located in lysosomal membrane-associated protein 1 (LAMP1)- and CD63-positive acidic inclusions. Brucella replicates in macrophages, dendritic cells, monocytes, trophoblasts, bone cells (osteoclasts, osteoblasts), granulocyte progenitors, adipocytes, and infects other cells such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, and erythrocytes. Some infected cells like neutrophils mediate Brucella ́s immune response modulation and/or serve as a Trojan horse to disseminate and infect new organs. Several anatomical compartments are populated by Brucella infected cells. Organs with high replication rates (placenta, epididymis, mammary glands, lymph nodes, spleen, liver, lungs, and bone marrow) correlate with clinical manifestations of the disease. Once an adaptive immune response is achieved or granulomas contain the infection, Brucella develops chronicity and persists at low replication rates. An organ reservoir would not exist without a pre-existing intracellular niche. The structures and physiological characteristics of organ reservoirs allow Brucella to start new infection cycles within natural or accidental hosts. Although Brucella detection in wild sheep, goats, frogs, fox, bats, and rodents seems almost inconsequential, bacterial loads might be maintained within the host. The zoonotic potential of wildlife reservoirs is still unknown but represents an important risk of transmission to livestock or humans (Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 15 December 2020)).

References

    1. Fouskis I., Sandalakis V., Christidou A., Tsatsaris A., Tzanakis N., Tselentis Y., Psaroulaki A. The epidemiology of Brucellosis in Greece, 2007–2012: A ‘One Health’ approach. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018;112:124–135. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guzmán-Hernández R.L., Contreras-Rodríguez A., Ávila-Calderón E.D., Morales-García M.R. Brucelosis: Zoonosis de importancia en México. Rev. Chil. Infectol. 2016;33:656–662. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182016000600007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hernández-Mora G., Bonilla-Montoya R., Barrantes-Granados O., Esquivel-Suárez A., Montero-Caballero D., González-Barrientos R., Fallas-Monge Z., Palacios-Alfaro J.D., Baldi M., Campos E., et al. Brucellosis in mammals of Costa Rica: An epidemiological survey. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0182644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182644. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zheng R., Xie S., Lu X., Sun L., Zhou Y., Zhang Y., Wang K. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis in China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018;2018:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2018/4769596. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franco M.P., Mulder M., Gilman R.H., Smits H.L. Human brucellosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2007;7:775–786. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70286-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /