This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 16;14(10):e0008270.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008270. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Impact of tiny targets on Glossina fuscipes quanzensis, the primary vector of human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Affiliations

Impact of tiny targets on Glossina fuscipes quanzensis, the primary vector of human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Inaki Tirados et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Over the past 20 years there has been a >95% reduction in the number of Gambian Human African trypanosomiasis (g-HAT) cases reported globally, largely as a result of large-scale active screening and treatment programmes. There are however still foci where the disease persists, particularly in parts of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Additional control efforts such as tsetse control using Tiny Targets may therefore be required to achieve g-HAT elimination goals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of Tiny Targets within DRC. In 2015-2017, pre- and post-intervention tsetse abundance data were collected from 1,234 locations across three neighbouring Health Zones (Yasa Bonga, Mosango, Masi Manimba). Remotely sensed dry season data were combined with pre-intervention tsetse presence/absence data from 332 locations within a species distribution modelling framework to produce a habitat suitability map. The impact of Tiny Targets on the tsetse population was then evaluated by fitting a generalised linear mixed model to the relative fly abundance data collected from 889 post-intervention monitoring sites within Yasa Bonga, with habitat suitability, proximity to the intervention and intervention duration as covariates. Immediately following the introduction of the intervention, we observe a dramatic reduction in fly catches by > 85% (pre-intervention: 0.78 flies/trap/day, 95% CI 0.676-0.900; 3 month post-intervention: 0.11 flies/trap/day, 95% CI 0.070-0.153) which is sustained throughout the study period. Declines in catches were negatively associated with proximity to Tiny Targets, and while habitat suitability is positively associated with abundance its influence is reduced in the presence of the intervention. This study adds to the body of evidence demonstrating the impact of Tiny Targets on tsetse across a range of ecological settings, and further characterises the factors which modify its impact. The habitat suitability maps have the potential to guide the expansion of tsetse control activities in this area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Authors Marleen Boelaert and Erick Mwamba Miaka were unable to confirm their authorship contributions. On their behalf, the corresponding author has reported their contributions to the best of their knowledge.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Locations of the 1,234 tsetse monitoring sites at which tsetse flies were collected between January 2015 –December 2017.
Pre-intervention sites i.e. sites where data were collected prior to or unaffected by the intervention are triangles colour-coded by year of collection. Monitoring sites i.e. sites sampled immediately prior to the intervention, then repeatedly at regular intervals following the intervention are prepresented by circles. The river networks across which Tiny Targets have been deployed is also presented, colour-coded colour-coded according to the year in which the intervention was first introduced.
Fig 2
Fig 2. A map of habitat suitability obtained using a boosted regression tree approach.
The fly counts (flies/trap/day) of each of the 332 trap sites used to fit the model is also displayed.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Proportion and associated 95% confidence interval of traps in which flies were present by the distance to the nearest recently deployed target.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Flies per catch per day by observation period and intervention area, and 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Holmes P. First WHO Meeting of Stakeholders on Elimination of Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:1–2. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003244 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Global Health Observatory data repository—Human African Trypanosomiasis. 2018.
    1. Franco JR, Cecchi G, Priotto G, Paone M, Diarra A, Grout L, et al. Monitoring the elimination of human African trypanosomiasis: Update to 2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:1–26. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005585 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rock KS, Torr SJ, Lumbala C, Keeling MJ. Quantitative evaluation of the strategy to eliminate human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:532 10.1186/s13071-015-1131-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rock KS, Pandey A, Ndeffo-Mbah ML, Atkins KE, Lumbala C, Galvani A, et al. Data-driven models to predict the elimination of sleeping sickness in former Equateur province of DRC. Epidemics. 2017;18:101–112. 10.1016/j.epidem.201701006 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /