This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 28;13(10):e0007771.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007771. eCollection 2019 Oct.

Combined sterile insect technique and incompatible insect technique: The first proof-of-concept to suppress Aedes aegypti vector populations in semi-rural settings in Thailand

Affiliations

Combined sterile insect technique and incompatible insect technique: The first proof-of-concept to suppress Aedes aegypti vector populations in semi-rural settings in Thailand

Pattamaporn Kittayapong et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Important arboviral diseases, such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus infections, are transmitted mainly by the Aedes aegypti vector. So far, controlling this vector species with current tools and strategies has not demonstrated sustainable and significant impacts. Our main objective was to evaluate whether open field release of sterile males, produced from combining the sterile insect technique using radiation with the insect incompatible technique through Wolbachia-induced incompatibility (SIT/IIT), could suppress natural populations of Ae. aegypti in semi-rural village settings in Thailand.

Methodology/principal findings: Irradiated Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti males produced by the SIT/IIT approach were completely sterile and were able to compete with the wild fertile ones. Open field release of these sterile males was conducted in an ecologically isolated village in Chachoengsao Province, eastern Thailand. House-to-house visit and media reports resulted in community acceptance and public awareness of the technology. During intervention, approximately 100-200 sterile males were released weekly in each household. After 6 months of sterile male release, a significant reduction (p<0.05) of the mean egg hatch rate (84%) and the mean number of females per household (97.30%) was achieved in the treatment areas when compared to the control ones.

Conclusions/significance: Our study represents the first open field release of sterile Ae. aegypti males developed from a combined SIT/IIT approach. Entomological assessment using ovitraps, adult sticky traps, and portable vacuum aspirators confirmed the success in reducing natural populations of Ae. aegypti females in treated areas. Public awareness through media resulted in positive support for practical use of this strategy in wider areas. Further study using a systematic randomized trial is needed to determine whether this approach could have a significant impact on the diseases transmitted by Ae. aegypti vector.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. GPS location of households in the treatment, the adjacent and the control areas in Plaeng Yao District, Chachoengsao Province, eastern Thailand, showing the sampling houses and the distance among them.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Graph shows the mean egg hatch rate of natural Aedes aegypti mosquito populations over time in the treatment, the adjacent and the control areas of the study sites during the baseline (a) and during the intervention (b) periods. Percent suppression efficiency in relation to the number of released sterile males per week is demonstrated in Fig 2B.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Graph shows the mean number of Aedes aegypti females per the study sites during the baseline (a) and during the intervention (b) periods. Percent suppression efficiency in relation to the number of released sterile males per month is demonstrated in Fig 3B.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Map shows the dispersal and the longevity of sterile Aedes aegypti male mosquitoes collected during the follow-up mark-release-recapture experiment at the study site.

References

    1. WHO/TDR. Dengue: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control WHO/TDR, Geneva, Switzerland: 2009. - PubMed
    1. Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Peeling RW. Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2010;8: S7–S16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380 (9859): 2095–2128. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Fact Sheet: World Malaria Report. 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/media/world-malaria-report-2015/en/.
    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, Hay SI. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446): 504–507. 10.1038/nature12060 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Full text links
Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /