This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 6;115(6):1304-1309.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715640115. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

Human ectoparasites and the spread of plague in Europe during the Second Pandemic

Affiliations

Human ectoparasites and the spread of plague in Europe during the Second Pandemic

Katharine R Dean et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Plague, caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, can spread through human populations by multiple transmission pathways. Today, most human plague cases are bubonic, caused by spillover of infected fleas from rodent epizootics, or pneumonic, caused by inhalation of infectious droplets. However, little is known about the historical spread of plague in Europe during the Second Pandemic (14-19th centuries), including the Black Death, which led to high mortality and recurrent epidemics for hundreds of years. Several studies have suggested that human ectoparasite vectors, such as human fleas (Pulex irritans) or body lice (Pediculus humanus humanus), caused the rapidly spreading epidemics. Here, we describe a compartmental model for plague transmission by a human ectoparasite vector. Using Bayesian inference, we found that this model fits mortality curves from nine outbreaks in Europe better than models for pneumonic or rodent transmission. Our results support that human ectoparasites were primary vectors for plague during the Second Pandemic, including the Black Death (1346-1353), ultimately challenging the assumption that plague in Europe was predominantly spread by rats.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Black Death; Monte Carlo Markov chain; SIR modeling; Yersinia pestis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Fit of three models of plague transmission to mortality during Second Pandemic outbreaks. The observed human mortality data (black dots) and the fit (mean and 95% credible interval) of three models for plague transmission [human ectoparasite (red), pneumonic (blue), and rat–flea (green)] for nine plague outbreaks: (A) Givry, France (1348), (B) Florence, Italy (1400), (C) Barcelona, Spain (1490), (D) London, England (1563), (E) Eyam, England (1665), (F) Gdansk, Poland (1709), (G) Stockholm, Sweden (1710), (H) Moscow, Russia (1772), and (I) Island of Malta, Malta (1813).

Comment in

References

    1. Bramanti B, Stenseth NC, Walløe L, Lei X. Plague: A disease which changed the path of human civilization. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;918:1–26. - PubMed
    1. Dennis DT, et al. Plague Manual: Epidemiology, Distribution, Surveillance and Control. WHO; Geneva: 1999. - PubMed
    1. Kugeler KJ, Staples JE, Hinckley AF, Gage KL, Mead PS. Epidemiology of human plague in the United States, 1900–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:16–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drancourt M, Houhamdi L, Raoult D. Yersinia pestis as a telluric, human ectoparasite-borne organism. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:234–241. - PubMed
    1. Gani R, Leach S. Epidemiologic determinants for modeling pneumonic plague outbreaks. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:608–614. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /