This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 30;11(11):e0006019.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006019. eCollection 2017 Nov.

The "F" in SAFE: Reliability of assessing clean faces for trachoma control in the field

Affiliations

The "F" in SAFE: Reliability of assessing clean faces for trachoma control in the field

Sheila K West et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Although facial cleanliness is part of the SAFE strategy for trachoma there is controversy over the reliability of measuring a clean face. A child's face with no ocular and nasal discharge is clean and the endpoint of interest, regardless of the number of times it must be washed to achieve that endpoint. The issue of reliability rests on the reproducibility of graders to assess a clean face. We report the reproducibility of assessing a clean face in a field trial in Kongwa, Tanzania.

Methods/findings: Seven graders were trained to assess the presence and absence of nasal and ocular discharge on children's faces. Sixty children ages 1-7 years were recruited from a community and evaluated independently by seven graders, once and again about 50 minutes later. Intra-and inter-observer variation was calculated using unweighted kappa statistics. The average intra-observer agreement was kappa = 0.72, and the average inter-observer agreement was kappa = 0.78.

Conclusions: Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement was substantial for the assessment of clean faces using trained Tanzania staff who represent a variety of educational backgrounds. As long as training is provided, the estimate of clean faces in children should be reliable, and reflect the effort of families to keep ocular and nasal discharge off the faces. These data suggest assessment of clean faces could be added to trachoma surveys, which already measure environmental improvements, in districts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Example image of fly on face below the child’s right eye.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Example of a minimal amount of nasal discharge.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Example of ocular discharge and a crusty eyelid.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Intraobserver agreement (Kappa score) for graders 1 through 7 for assessment of clean face between trials one and two.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Inter-observer agreement (Kappa score) between grader 1 and graders 2 through 7.

References

    1. Taylor HR, Burton MJ, Haddad D, West S, Wright H (2014) Trachoma. Lancet 384: 2142–2152. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62182-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elwell C, Mirrashidi K, Engel J (2016) Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 385–400. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosse MM, Hayward RD, Subtil A (2016) One Face of Chlamydia trachomatis: The Infectious Elementary Body. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. - PubMed
    1. West SK, Munoz B, Bobo L, Quinn T, Mkocha H, et al. (1993) Nonocular chlamydial infection and risk of ocular reinfection after mass treatment in a trachoma hyperendemic area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34: 3194–3198. - PubMed
    1. Gower EW, Solomon AW, Burton MJ, Aguirre A, Munoz B, et al. (2006) Chlamydial positivity of nasal discharge at baseline is associated with ocular chlamydial positivity 2 months following azithromycin treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 4767–4771. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /