This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):e0006015.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006015. eCollection 2017 Nov.

Dynamics of American tegumentary leishmaniasis in a highly endemic region for Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis infection in northeast Brazil

Affiliations

Dynamics of American tegumentary leishmaniasis in a highly endemic region for Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis infection in northeast Brazil

Juliana Silva et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis (ATL) caused by Leishmania braziliensis is endemic in Corte de Pedra, Northeast Brazil. Most L. braziliensis infections manifest as localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Disseminated manifestations include mucosal leishmaniasis (ML), present at a low constant level for several decades, and newly emerging disseminated leishmaniasis (DL). Surprisingly, DL has recently surpassed ML in its spatial distribution. This led us to hypothesize that distinct forms of ATL might spread in different patterns through affected regions.

Methodology/principal findings: We explored the incidence and geographic dispersion of the three clinical types of ATL over a span of nearly two decades in Corte de Pedra. We obtained the geographic coordinates of the homes of patients with ATL during 1992-1996, 1999-2003 and 2008-2011. The progressive dispersion of ML or DL in each time period was compared to that of CL in 2008-2011 with the Cusick and Edward's geostatistical test. To evaluate whether ATL occurred as clusters, we compared each new case in 2008-2011 with the frequency of and distance from cases in the previous 3 to 12 months. The study revealed that DL, ML and CL actively spread within that region, but in distinct patterns. Whereas CL and DL propagated in clusters, ML occurred as sporadic cases. DL had a wider distribution than ML until 2003, but by 2011 both forms were distributed equally in Corte de Pedra. The incidence of ML fluctuated over time at a rate that was distinct from those of CL and DL.

Conclusions/significance: These findings suggest that CL and DL maintain endemic levels through successive outbreaks of cases. The sporadic pattern of ML cases may reflect the long and variable latency before infected patients develop clinically detectable mucosal involvement. Intimate knowledge of the geographic distribution of leishmaniasis and how it propagates within foci of active transmission may guide approaches to disease control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Dynamic distribution of ATL in Corte de Pedra.
(A) Cumulative distribution of DL during three time periods: (red) 1992–1996, (white) 1999–2003, (black) 2008–2011. (B) Cumulative distribution of ML during two time periods: (white) 1999–2003, (black) 2008–2011. (C) Cumulative distribution of CL during two time periods: (white) 1999–2003, (black) 2008–2011.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Spearman correlation between frequency of closest recent leishmaniasis cases and distance to a new leishmaniasis diagnosis in Corte de Pedra.
Recent cases defined as those cases occurring within the previous six months to a newly diagnosed case are depicted. (A) ATL cases (r = -0.94, p = 0.0083). (B) CL cases (r = -0.94, p = 0.0083). (C) DL cases (r = -0.99, p = 0.0014). (D) ML cases (r = 0.26, p = 0.3292). For each newly diagnosed (i.e. novel) case of leishmaniasis, the closest recent case of the same clinical type was determined. Then, the number of newly diagnosed cases that presented a closest recent case within a discrete 2.5 km distance interval was plotted against the distance interval units. The following distance intervals (in meters) were employed: 0–2500, 2501–5000, 5001–7500, 7501–10000 and 10001–12500.

References

    1. Murray HW, Berman JD, Davies CR, Saravia NG. Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet. 2005;366(9496):1561–77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67629-5 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvar J, Velez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35671 Epub 2012年06月14日. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3365071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. (PAHO) PAHO. Leishmaniases: Epidemiological report of the Americas. Report Leishmaniases. 2013;1:4.
    1. Thomaz-Soccol V, Lanotte G, Rioux JA, Pratlong F, Martini-Dumas A, Serres E. Phylogenetic taxonomy of New World Leishmania. Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparee. 1993;68(2):104–6. . - PubMed
    1. David CV, Craft N. Cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Dermatologic therapy. 2009;22(6):491–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2009.01272.x . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /