This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 4:14:1135.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1135.

A social-ecological analysis of community perceptions of dengue fever and Aedes aegypti in Machala, Ecuador

Affiliations

A social-ecological analysis of community perceptions of dengue fever and Aedes aegypti in Machala, Ecuador

Anna M Stewart Ibarra et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The growing burden of dengue fever and the lack of a vaccine or specific medical treatment have increased the urgency of the public health sector to identify alternative management strategies. A prevailing trend in Latin America has been a shift towards decentralized vector control programs with integrated management strategies, requiring significant intersectoral coordination, community engagement, and knowledge of the local social-ecological system (SES). Community perceptions and responses are a critical component of this system, since perceptions shape actions, and thus govern behavioral responses and acceptance of shifts in policy and management.

Methods: We investigated perceptions, misconceptions, and local SES risk factors for dengue in high risk communities located at the urban periphery and center in Machala, Ecuador. We facilitated twelve focus group discussions with community members using semi-structured question guides and causal diagrams. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded to identify emergent themes using qualitative methods for theme analysis. To estimate the relative importance of the themes in each study area, we tabulated the number of focus groups in which each theme was present. Household surveys (n = 79) were conducted to further explore these themes, and we compared survey responses from the two areas using descriptive statistics.

Results: We identified thirty biophysical, political-institutional, and community-household risk factors for dengue. People at the periphery identified a greater number of risk factors. Dengue control required considerable investment of time and resources, which presented a greater challenge for women and people at the periphery. Common misperceptions included confusion with other febrile diseases, lack of knowledge of transmission mechanisms, and misconceptions about mosquito behavior. People perceived that dengue control programs had been limited by the lack of inter-institutional coordination and lack of social cohesion.

Conclusions: There is a need for local, policy-relevant research that can be translated to strengthen the design, implementation, and evaluation of new dengue management strategies. This study contributes to a growing body of research in this area. Based on these findings, we identify key policy and management recommendations that will inform the ongoing transition to a decentralized dengue control program in Ecuador and other dengue endemic countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annual dengue fever incidence in El Oro Province, 2000–2013 [ [6] ].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Location of study sites in Machala, Ecuador. Central area (CA) and peripheral area (PA) study sites indicated, with urban neighborhoods and land use. Land use map source: Ecuadorian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Aquaculture and Fisheries (MAGAP), http://geoportal.magap.gob.ec/. Neighborhood map source: National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology of Ecuador (INAMHI).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk factors associated with dengue identified through a thematic analysis of causal diagrams. Font size indicates the number of focus groups in which the theme emerged (range 1 to 6). Themes that emerged only from the peripheral area (PA) are in italics; themes only from the central area (CA) are underlined.

References

    1. San Martín JL, Brathwaite O, Zambrano B, Solórzano JO, Bouckenooghe A, Dayan GH, Guzmán MG. The epidemiology of dengue in the Americas over the last three decades: a worrisome reality. The Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:128–135. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0346. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guzmán MG, Brathwaite O, Enria D, Hunsperger E, Kouri G, Montoya R, Rodriguez-Roche R, Vasconcelos P, San Martín JL. Dengue in the American Region. An Update. 2013.
    1. Dirección Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica . Anuario Epidemiológico. Quito, Ecuador: Ministerio de Salud Pública de Ecuador; 2014.
    1. Arunachalam N, Tana S, Espino F, Kittayapong P, Abeyewickrem W, Wai KT, Tyagi BK, Kroeger A, Sommerfeld J, Petzold M. Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: a multicountry study in urban and periurban Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:173–184. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067892. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quintero J, Brochero H, Manrique-Saide P, Barrera-Pérez M, Basso C, Romero S, Caprara A, Cunha JCDL, Beltran Ayala E, Mitchell-Foster K, Kroeger A, Sommerfeld J, Petzold M. Ecological, biological and social dimensions of dengue vector breeding in five urban settings of Latin America: a multi-country study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-38. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1135/prepub

Publication types

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /