Merits and pitfalls of currently used diagnostic tools in mycetoma
- PMID: 24992636
- PMCID: PMC4080999
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002918
Merits and pitfalls of currently used diagnostic tools in mycetoma
Abstract
Treatment of mycetoma depends on the causative organism and since many organisms, both actinomycetes (actinomycetoma) and fungi (eumycetoma), are capable of producing mycetoma, an accurate diagnosis is crucial. Currently, multiple diagnostic tools are used to determine the extent of infections and to identify the causative agents of mycetoma. These include various imaging, cytological, histopathological, serological, and culture techniques; phenotypic characterisation; and molecular diagnostics. In this review, we summarize these techniques and identify their merits and pitfalls in the identification of the causative agents of mycetoma and the extent of the disease. We also emphasize the fact that there is no ideal diagnostic tool available to identify the causative agents and that future research should focus on the development of new and reliable diagnostic tools.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Ahmed AO, van Leeuwen W, Fahal A, van de Sande WWJ, Verbrugh H, et al. (2004) Mycetoma caused by Madurella mycetomatis: a neglected infectious burden. Lancet Infect Dis 4: 566–574. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed A, van de Sande WWJ, Fahal A, Bakker-Woudenberg IA, Verbrugh H, et al. (2007) Management of mycetoma: major challenge in tropical mycoses with limited international recognition. Curr Opin Infect Dis 20: 146–151. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical