This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;5(5):e1179.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001179. Epub 2011 May 24.

Economic impact of cystic echinococcosis in peru

Affiliations

Economic impact of cystic echinococcosis in peru

Pedro L Moro et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) constitutes an important public health problem in Peru. However, no studies have attempted to estimate the monetary and non-monetary impact of CE in Peruvian society.

Methods: We used official and published sources of epidemiological and economic information to estimate direct and indirect costs associated with livestock production losses and human disease in addition to surgical CE-associated disability adjusted life years (DALYs) lost.

Findings: The total estimated cost of human CE in Peru was U.S.2,420,348ドル (95% CI:1,118,384-4,812,722) per year. Total estimated livestock-associated costs due to CE ranged from U.S.196,681ドル (95% CI:141,641-251,629) if only direct losses (i.e., cattle and sheep liver destruction) were taken into consideration to U.S.3,846,754ドル (95% CI:2,676,181-4,911,383) if additional production losses (liver condemnation, decreased carcass weight, wool losses, decreased milk production) were accounted for. An estimated 1,139 (95% CI: 861-1,489) DALYs were also lost due to surgical cases of CE.

Conclusions: This preliminary and conservative assessment of the socio-economic impact of CE on Peru, which is based largely on official sources of information, very likely underestimates the true extent of the problem. Nevertheless, these estimates illustrate the negative economic impact of CE in Peru.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Moro PL, Schantz PM. Echinococcosis: A review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;13:125–33. - PubMed
    1. Moro PL, McDonald J, Gilman RH, Silva B, Verastegui M, et al. Epidemiology of Echinococcus granulosus infection in the central Peruvian Andes. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1997;75:553–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moro PL, Bonifacio N, Gilman RH, Lopera L, Silva B, et al. Field diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus infection among intermediate and definitive hosts in an endemic focus of human cystic echinococcosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:611–5. - PubMed
    1. Dueger EL, Gilman RH. Prevalence, intensity, and fertility of ovine cystic echinococcosis in the central Peruvian Andes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:379–83. - PubMed
    1. Torgerson PR, Carmona C, Bonifacino R. Estimating the economic effects of cystic echinococcosis: Uruguay, a developing country with upper-middle income. Ann Trop Med Parasit. 2000;94:703–13. - PubMed
Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /