This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 1;99(8):1681-1697.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2008年01月01日2.

A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models1

A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models1

Hae-Ryoung Song et al. J Multivar Anal. .

Abstract

Gaussian geostatistical models (GGMs) and Gaussian Markov random fields (GM-RFs) are two distinct approaches commonly used in spatial models for modeling point referenced and areal data, respectively. In this paper, the relations between GGMs and GMRFs are explored based on approximations of GMRFs by GGMs, and approximations of GGMs by GMRFs. Two new metrics of approximation are proposed: (i) the Kullback-Leibler discrepancy of spectral densities and (ii) the chi-squared distance between spectral densities. The distances between the spectral density functions of GGMs and GMRFs measured by these metrics are minimized to obtain the approximations of GGMs and GMRFs. The proposed methodologies are validated through several empirical studies. We compare the performance of our approach to other methods based on covariance functions, in terms of the average mean squared prediction error and also the computational time. A spatial analysis of a dataset on PM(2.5) collected in California is presented to illustrate the proposed method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) First order neighbors (b) Second order neighbors (c) Third order neighbors
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) neighborhood I, (b) neighborhood II, (c) neighborhood III
Figure 3
Figure 3
a) point level PM2.5 values, b) county level averaged PM2.5 values and c) predicted values using GMRFs estimated by the CSDS

References

    1. Arfken G, Weber HJ. Mathematical Methods for Physicists. 4th ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press; 1995.
    1. Besag J. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1974;36:192–236.
    1. Besag J. On a system of two-dimensional recurrence equations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1981;43:302–309.
    1. Besag J, Kooperberg C. On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions. Biometrika. 1995;82:733–746.
    1. Besag J, York JC, Mollie A. Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics (with discussion) Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. 1991;43:1–59.

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /