Effect of city-wide sanitation programme on reduction in rate of childhood diarrhoea in northeast Brazil: assessment by two cohort studies
- PMID: 17993362
- PMCID: PMC2212752
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61638-9
Effect of city-wide sanitation programme on reduction in rate of childhood diarrhoea in northeast Brazil: assessment by two cohort studies
Abstract
Background: A city-wide sanitation intervention was started in Salvador, Brazil, in 1997 to improve sewerage coverage from 26% of households to 80%. Our aim was to investigate the epidemiological effect of this city-wide sanitation programme on diarrhoea morbidity in children less than 3 years of age.
Methods: The investigation was composed of two longitudinal studies done in 1997-98 before the intervention (the sanitation programme) and in 2003-04 after the intervention had been completed. Each study consisted of a cohort of children (841 in the preintervention study and 1007 in the postintervention study; age 0-36 months at baseline) who were followed up for a maximum of 8 months. Children were sampled from 24 sentinel areas that were randomly chosen to represent the range of environmental conditions in the study site. At the start of each study an individual or household questionnaire was applied by trained fieldworkers; an environmental survey was done in each area before and after introduction of the sanitation programme to assess basic neighbourhood and household sanitation conditions. Daily diarrhoea data were obtained during home visits twice per week. The effect of the intervention was estimated by a hierarchical modelling approach fitting a sequence of multivariate regression models.
Findings: Diarrhoea prevalence fell by 21% (95% CI 18-25%)-from 9.2 (9.0-9.5) days per child-year before the intervention to 7.3 (7.0-7.5) days per child-year afterwards. After adjustment for baseline sewerage coverage and potential confounding variables, we estimated an overall prevalence reduction of 22% (19-26%).
Interpretation: Our results show that urban sanitation is a highly effective health measure that can no longer be ignored, and they provide a timely support for the launch of 2008 as the International Year of Sanitation.
Figures
Comment in
-
A clarion call for greater investment in global sanitation.Durrheim D. Durrheim D. Lancet. 2007 Nov 10;370(9599):1592-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61668-7. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17993346 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fewtrell L, Kaufmann RB, Kay D, Enanoria W, Haller L, Colford JM., Jr. Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:42–52. - PubMed
-
- Laxminarayan R, Chow J, Shahid-Salles SA. Intervention cost-effectiveness: overview of main messages. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press; New York: 2006. pp. 35–86. 35–86.
-
- United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Human Development Report 2006. Beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis. Palgrave Macmillan; New York: 2006.
-
- Cairncross S, Valdmanis V. Water supply, sanitation, and hygiene promotion. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edn. Oxford University Pressk; New York: 2006. pp. 771–792.
Uncited reference
-
- Alderman H, Hentschel J, Sabates R. With the help of one's neighbors: externalities in the production of nutrition in Peru. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:2019–2031. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources