This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Dec 16;1(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/1478-7954年1月11日.

How do Zimbabweans value health states?

Affiliations

How do Zimbabweans value health states?

Jennifer Jelsma et al. Popul Health Metr. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of life weights based on valuations of health states are often used in cost utility analysis and population health measures. This paper reports on an attempt to develop quality of life weights within the Zimbabwe context. METHODS: 2,384 residents in randomly selected small residential plots of land in a high-density suburb of Harare valued descriptors of 38 health states based on different combinations of the five domains of the EQ-5D (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). The English version of the EQ-5D was used. The time trade-off method was used to determine the values, and 19,020 individual preferences for health states were analysed. A residual maximum likelihood linear mixed model was used to estimate a function for predicting the values of all possible combinations of levels on the five domains. The model was fit to a random subset of two-thirds of the observations, with the remaining observations reserved for analysis of predictive validity. The results were compared to a similar study undertaken in the United Kingdom. RESULTS: A credible model was developed to predict the values of states that were not valued directly. In the subset of observations reserved for validation, the mean absolute difference between predicted and observed values was 0.045. All domains of the EQ-5D were found to contribute significantly to the model, both at the moderate and severe levels. Severe pain was found to have the largest negative coefficient, followed by the inability to wash and dress oneself. CONCLUSION: Despite a generally lower education level than their European counterparts, urban Zimbabweans appear to value health states in a consistent manner, and the determination of a global method of establishing quality of life weights may be feasible and valid. However, as the relative weightings of the different domains, although correlated, differed from the standard set of weights recommended by the EuroQol Group, the locally determined coefficients should be used within the Zimbabwean context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed TTO scores (divided by 10) of the full Zimbabwe sample (N = 19,020 values from 2,183 respondents), compared to observed scores from the Measurement and Valuation of Health study in the United Kingdom [8].

References

    1. Bowling A. Health care rationing: the public's debate. BMJ. 1996;312:670–674. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bala M, Wood L, Zarkin G, Norton E, Gafni A, O'Brien B. Valuing outcomes in health care: A comparison of willingness to pay and quality adjusted life years. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:667–676. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00036-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray CJL. Rethinking DALYs. In: Murray CJL and Lopez AD, editor. The Global Burden of Disease. 1st. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Harvard School of Public Health; 1996. pp. 1–89.
    1. Essink-Bot M, Krabbe P, Bonsel GJ, Aaronson NK. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. Medical Care. 1997;35:522–537. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagner AK, Gandek B, Aaronson N, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bullinger M, Bjorner J, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ware JE. Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:925–932. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00083-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /