Almost every article I've read 1 1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcon graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
Almost every article I've read 1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcon graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
Almost every article I've read 1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcon graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
Why is the sudden increase in number of Git submitters on Debian popcornpopcon graph in 2010-01?
Almost every article I've read 1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcornpopcon graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
Why is the sudden increase in number of Git submitters on Debian popcorn graph in 2010-01?
Almost every article I've read 1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcorn graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
Why is the sudden increase in number of Git submitters on Debian popcon graph in 2010-01?
Almost every article I've read 1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcon graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
- 20.5k
- 29
- 117
- 310
Almost every article youI've read1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcorn graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
Almost every article you read comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout). But at some point Git suddenly became super popular and literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
Almost every article I've read1 comparing Git and Mercurial it seems like Mercurial has a better command line UX with each command being limited to one idea only (unlike say git checkout).
But at some point Git suddenly became looking super popular and number of Git submitters on Debian popcorn graph (see graph image below) literally exploded.
Git vs. Mercurial popularity
Source: Debian
What happened in 2010-01 that things suddenly changed. Looks like GitHub was founded earlier than that - 2008.
- 53.8k
- 14
- 139
- 225