Martin McEvoy wrote: > Martin McEvoy wrote: >> Toby A Inkster wrote: >>> Martin McEvoy wrote: >>>> Toby A Inkster wrote: >>>>>>>> > What's wrong with simply using hAtom as it is (possibly with the >>>> > addition of Sarven's "in-reply-to" proposal) > [...edit...] >>>> Ok lets re-use hatom terms only this works... >>>>>>>> <div class="hentry"> >>>> <address class="author vcard"> >>>> <span class="entry-title"><a class="url fn" >>>> href="http://contributor.com/blog/">Contributor</a> said</span> >>>> </address> >>>> about <abbr class="updated" title="2008年09月01日T14:40:45+01:00">72 >>>> days ago</abbr>, >>>> <div class="entry-content"> >>>> <p>Hey Great Post</p> >>>> </div> >>>> <a rel="bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a> >>>> </div> >>>>>>>> Is this proposed mark up acceptable there is a test page here: >>>> http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html >>>>>>>> and the extracted Atom Is here: >>>> http://transformr.co.uk/hatom/http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html >>>>>> I have updated the comment brainstorming pages, the Schema[1] strictly > re-uses hAtom[2] terms >> [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema > [2] http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom >> Thanks >I would also like to propose that an hEntry that is a comment should be marked up like this..... <div class="comment hentry"> ... </div> This will define the difference between the Post hEntry and a comment hEntry Thanks -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/