[uf-new] Re: Namespace anti-pattern and hAudio TITLE

Walter Logeman walter at psybernet.co.nz
Fri Feb 8 16:06:09 PST 2008


In the Proposal put forward by Manu [1] would the distinction you 
propose Andy be allowed? possible? encouraged? needed?
Walter
-
Andy Mabbett wrote:
>> So, who is going to make an argument against using TITLE in hAudio?
>> I'm not, but I do think we should allow for distinction between the
> titles of tracks, albums, works and similar.
>> This could take the form of:
>> album-title
> track-title
> etc.
>> or it could be:
>> <foo class="album">
> <fooclass="title">
> Meddle
> </foo>
> </foo>
>> <foo class="track">
> <fooclass="title">
> One of These Days
> </foo>
> </foo>
>> The former, hyphenated, pattern could again borrow the DC "qualified"
> model, and be treated by parsers as equivalent to "title" for some
> purposes", but distinguished from each other, for other purposes.

 
[1]http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-February/001468.html


More information about the microformats-new mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /