[uf-discuss] inappropriate behaviour

Thu Aug 23 07:15:07 PDT 2007

Scott,
I think everyone would agree with your statement. However, Andy's 
concern with regards to the administration still hasn't been 
addressed. This is the second time since I have subscribed to this 
list that there has been someone temporarily banned and both times 
there was the perception that the administration acted unfairly.
I think the only think Andy is asking is for the administration to 
act with a bit of transparency & consistency.
Ciao,
Griffin
On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>>> My real concern is not with your intemperate response, but with 
>> the hypocrisy of an administration that allows you free reign to 
>> make one, but penalises another editor for disagreeing with a 
>> member of that administration, using far milder terms.
>> I think everyone here has free reign to make a mistake now and 
> then. We're only human. It's only repeated mistakes that threaten 
> to change our community standards. If the list were full of name- 
> calling, for example, people would start to think name-calling were 
> acceptable in this community. So in those cases, we have to take 
> some action if we want to maintain our community standards. In my 
> opinion, those tasked with this job do have an increased 
> responsibility to adhere to those standards (e.g. "be nice"). But 
> we're still only human, so we're still permitted the occasional 
> mistake, just like everyone else.
>> Peace,
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss