On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: >> Further to discussion at: >> <http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-brainstorming#ADR_with_no_children> >> it is proposed to amend the adr spec, and the corresponding part of the > hCard spec, thus: --- i disagree. Any ADR that has no structured data is just a LABEL. ADR has a structure, and therefore an ADR with no children has NO structure and parsers do NOT have to anything more! The spec and RFC is pretty clear on this. > Where the adr has content, but no valid sub-properties, parsers > [MAY | SHOULD | MUST] output the content of that adr as a single > vCard [output-field] field. >> Please express you opinions at: >> <http://microformats.org/wiki/adr-poll> >> where I have set up a straw-poll page for your convenience. >> (should this also be mentioned on the -dev list?) >> -- > Andy Mabbett > * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> > * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> > * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > microformats-discuss at microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > -- brian suda http://suda.co.uk