Microformats do seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

Wed Dec 13 03:17:14 PST 2006

Ciaran,
>On 12/11/06, Tim White <tjameswhite at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> To address the poster's concerns, <address> is a block-level
>element, not inline,
>>This would seem to contradict that?
>http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.6
>>I've stayed away from using <address> on some of my pages precisely
>because of this, so I'd be delighted to find I'd read it wrong!
>>-Ciaran McNulty

I believe that the (%inline) refers to what <address> can contain -- inline elements. See same structure for headings:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5

I'm not the greatest at reading those specs, so if someone else can confirm that, I'd appreciate it.
~ Tim 
tjameswhite.com

____________________________________________________________________________________
Have a burning question? 
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.

Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

Microformats do seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)