[uf-discuss] More on hAtom nomenclature

Wed Oct 26 11:07:11 PDT 2005

Hi David,
On Oct 26, 2005, at 4:41 AM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
> I understand that people have various ideas where this should go 
> and applicability to other data types, etc.. However, can I be 
> given a little room to actually get a proposal together rather than 
> just editing what I wrote to make it something else. I.e. renaming 
> "atomentry" -> "entry".

My apologies -- I mistakenly interpreted a comment that you had made 
to the effect that you had trouble editing the wiki so you wanted 
*me* to make that change. I apologize for unintentionally trampling 
your work -- that was not my intent.
> If you think what I've done is wrong, misguided or needs further 
> work, bring the topic up on [[hatom-issues]] and we'll work as a 
> group to a consenus of what should be changed.

Absolutely -- that is 100% how I agree things should be done, and I 
regret inadvertently acting otherwise.
I would change it back, but I'm afraid of screwing things up worse, 
so I'd appreciate it if someone more clueful could revert my edits. 
Thanks.
-- Ernie P.
>> Regards, etc...
> David
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

------------
Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. <drernie at opendarwin.org>
Ex-Physicist, Marketing Weenie, and Dilettante Hacker
Probe-Hacker blog: http://www.opendarwin.org/~drernie/