Bryan J Busch wrote: >><p> >>Last update: >><abbr class="page-last-modified" title="20050102">2 Jan 2005</abbr> >> </p> >>>>Hm. Shouldn't be 'page' because in many cases the item last modified is not necessarily stand-alone. I would just say 'last-modified'. Also, looking at the various systems of designating dates online, a plain format such as '20050102' and '2 Jan 2005' is definitely non-standard. Minimally, I would recommend adoption of the W3C's recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime See also ISO 8601 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 -- Stephen -- Stephen Downes ~ Research Officer ~ National Research Council Canada http://www.downes.ca ~ stephen at downes.ca __\|/__ Free Learning -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/attachments/20050816/dba3b22c/attachment.html