This Query is part of the Worldbuilding Resources Article.
As you all know there is a series of questions that have been asked to create fictional creatures in a realistic evolutionary way.
And below is a summarized list of all of the questions in order of post, so that a link to this meta post should be enough for future questions.
May 8, 2025: We have periodically had people try to use the language, below, to justify something the ACS was not originally intended to do: describe the evolutionary path of a creature (usually in the form of a short list of "evolutionary pressures"). That is outside the rules of the ACS. An answer to an ACS question may take one and only one form: the physiology of the creature in question as it could be in the Real World today. Requests seeking to understand how that physiology came to pass will be arbitrarily closed.
Edit
Due to a large amount of low quality question using this series' formula, user JBH has suggested adding specifications to the core idea of the series. Below are the most recent rendition of the rules as of April 27 2018. If a question has used the title Anatomically Correct and you feel it's poorly executed, please link to this post.
The Anatomically Correct (AC) series of questions are a popular tradition on Worldbuilding.SE. Their purpose is to invite site participants to consider how to describe fictional or mythological creatures from an evolutionary context with as much biological and behavioral realism as possible.
- In keeping with the Stack's general rule of not fielding questions about 3rd party or commercial worlds, the ACS is now limited to questions about documented myths and legends of Humanity and creatures thoroughly designed (other than lacking anatomical fulfillment) for a fictional world of the OP's own creation. (Source)
It is the responsibility of the questioner to provide sufficient detail to specifically identify the creature in question.
Generalizations such as "Elves as commonly found in fantasy stories" or "vampires" (without further clarification) are unacceptable and grounds for closing the question as "Unclear what you're asking."
Links to specific examples of the creature in question are encouraged, but may not be used alone. A specific description of the creature is required or the question will again be closed as "Unclear what you're asking." An ambiguous or insufficient description may result in closure due to the question becoming "Primarily opinion-based."
Images of the creature are always appreciated. If possible, reduce large images to a width of 450 pixels and link the image to a larger version. As with links, images may not be used alone. A specific description is required to avoid closure.
Creature descriptions must include important behavioral attributes and a clear physical description. It is the questioner's responsibility to invent the creature and the privilege of participants to explain how that invention could be manifest with evolutionary believability. To coin a phrase, We're willing to help, but we will not invent the creature and summon it into this world for you.
This question writing guide was developed long after the first AC question was asked. While we encourage questioners to review earlier AC questions to better understand how to meet these requirements, the fact that some previously asked questions do not meet these expectations may not be used to justify a poor question.
The best answer is expected to be the one that provides the greatest detail, the greatest creativity, and the greatest capacity for suspension of disbelief.
-
If you have come to comment on a recent Anatomically Correct post that needs to be added, please post that on the community answer, or I will not see it. Also, the question cannot have been closed within a week of posting because of being off-topic or a duplicate.
-
34$\begingroup$ Er...why "anatomically" correct? Aren't these just "scientifically correct"? "Anatomically" doesn't mean "evolutionarily", and "anatomically correct" typically means "including genitalia, nipples, etc." (E.g. there's a line in Batman & Robin making light of the infamous "bat-nipples" on the costumes in that movie: "an anatomically correct rubber suit puts fire in a girl's...lips.") $\endgroup$Kyle Strand– Kyle Strand2015年12月02日 22:50:50 +00:00Commented Dec 2, 2015 at 22:50
-
2$\begingroup$ ...and if you haven't seen that film but have heard how terrible it is, and you've wondered if it can possibly be as bad as people say, that line should tell you all you need to know. $\endgroup$Kyle Strand– Kyle Strand2015年12月02日 22:51:27 +00:00Commented Dec 2, 2015 at 22:51
-
5$\begingroup$ @KyleStrand: "anatomically correct" does usually refer to sex organs, but can also refer to any other part normally depicted in an unrealistic manner. For example, typing "anatomically correct" in Google gives me "... heart" as the fourth suggestion. ("... baby dolls" is the first suggestion, and creepy images related to that search show up as you're typing. You might not want to try this at home.) $\endgroup$MichaelS– MichaelS2016年01月15日 06:43:20 +00:00Commented Jan 15, 2016 at 6:43
-
1$\begingroup$ @MichaelS Good point. Even so, that still doesn't really match the intended meaning here! $\endgroup$Kyle Strand– Kyle Strand2016年01月15日 17:39:25 +00:00Commented Jan 15, 2016 at 17:39
-
2$\begingroup$ That response doesn't actually make much sense. Your question indicates that what you mean is "realistic evolutionary" creatures, but that is not what "anatomically correct" means. "Anatomically correct" does not seem to mean what you think it means. $\endgroup$Kyle Strand– Kyle Strand2016年01月25日 21:02:19 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 21:02
-
2$\begingroup$ @KyleStrand anatomically correct means one of two things; (1) referring to correctly sexual organs in dolls OR (2) a part of a creature correctly placed and existing. These questions use the second meaning. $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年01月25日 21:06:27 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 21:06
-
8$\begingroup$ But you're not talking about "a part of" a creature. You're talking about the entire creature designed in such a way as to conform to all kinds of scientific principles, including but not limited too anatomy. $\endgroup$Kyle Strand– Kyle Strand2016年01月25日 21:09:18 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 21:09
-
4$\begingroup$ @KyleStrand good point, but I am not going to change it, so either be angry over a slight term that doesn't matter, or accept it. Your choice, I am not arguing this anymore. $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年01月25日 21:49:29 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 21:49
-
9$\begingroup$ I'm not angry, I'm just trying to help you use a correct term (I even suggested an obvious one, "scientifically correct") instead of a silly and incorrect one. Clearly you're not open to suggestions, which I suppose is fine. $\endgroup$Kyle Strand– Kyle Strand2016年01月25日 22:30:32 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 22:30
-
2$\begingroup$ @KyleStrand it's not that I'm not open, it's that I don't want to spend hour replacing the links and titles. I am a busy guy and I don't care enough about some title to change it $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年01月25日 22:32:42 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 22:32
-
8$\begingroup$ Er... same difference. If you're not willing to change the phrase, then by definition you're not open to change suggestions. But I thought you were not going to argue the point any more? In any case, if the time required to make the change is the only thing holding you back from doing so, you could ask for help. Suggested edits to your question & answer here on meta aren't permitted, though, so you'd have to change these yourself. $\endgroup$Kyle Strand– Kyle Strand2016年01月25日 22:39:11 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 22:39
-
5$\begingroup$ why not just tag them as anatomically-correct? It's the sort of thing that seems to come up enough--to a lurker like me--that it wouldn't be crazy to have a tag for it. $\endgroup$nitsua60– nitsua602016年01月25日 23:16:56 +00:00Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 23:16
-
1$\begingroup$ @KyleStrand Or "a creature with all its parts anatomically correct". $\endgroup$Damian Yerrick– Damian Yerrick2016年01月27日 00:27:48 +00:00Commented Jan 27, 2016 at 0:27
-
10$\begingroup$ That whole series irks me because the anatomy of a species is directly shaped by the species itself. So for instance "Anatomically correct human" means "A human that has all their organs, limbs and other bodily structures at pretty much the same lengths, widths and proportions as humans in general". Now translate that to every other species in this series. How would we know if one particular unicorn is "anatomically correct"? By comparing him to every other unicorn and see if he matches. Right.... so where are all our other unicorns to compare with? Uhm... $\endgroup$MichaelK– MichaelK2016年08月14日 23:33:30 +00:00Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 23:33
-
5$\begingroup$ @MichaelKarnerfors believe me, I am aware of the problems with the title. Keep in mind that it is just a catchy title. $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年08月14日 23:46:49 +00:00Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 23:46
1 Answer 1
+The questions of the series are listed below in order of oldest to newest.
Anatomically Correct Griffin asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Angels asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Nuckelavee asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct God asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Werewolves asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Pheonix asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Cyclops asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct 4-Legged Sapient Creatures asked by Crissov
Anatomically Correct Golem asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Elemental Asked by Andyd273
Anatomically Correct Nanaue asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Medusa asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Harpy Asked by Caleb Woodman
Anatomically Correct Jackalope asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Xenomorph asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Hydra asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Naga Asked by Jackwise
Anatomically Correct Unicorn asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct King Kong asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Khajiit asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Gnolls asked by Shalvenay
Anatomically Correct Pixie asked by Renan
Anatomically Correct Argonian asked by fi12
Anatomically Correct Sleipnir asked by Ghanima
Anatomically Correct Graboid asked by Renan
Anatomically Correct Tomte asked by Grollo
Anatomically Correct Cerberus asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Giant asked by LCIII
Anatomically Correct Arachne asked by 渡し守シャロン
Anatomically Correct Murloc asked by Sky
Anatomically Correct Ent asked by 渡し守シャロン
Anatomically Correct Spriggan asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Minotaur asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Pegasus asked by Yacomini
Anatomically Correct Slenderman asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Creeper asked by T3 H40
Anatomically Correct Slimes asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Multi-armed Humanoids asked by MarqFJA87
Anatomically Correct Huddle asked by TrEs-2b
Anatomically Correct Ponies asked by gaazkam
Anatomically Correct Ahuizotl asked by cowrie
Anatomically Correct Chocobo asked by Jakob Lovern
Anatomically Correct Kappa asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Satyrs asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Vampires asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Akaname asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Trolls asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Ghouls asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Penanggalan asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Zerg Overlord asked by Renan
Anatomically Correct Oni asked by TGCF
Anatomically Correct Mandrake asked by TGCF
Anatomically Correct Siren asked by incognito
Anatomically Correct Zombie asked by Magus
Anatomically Correct "XKCDius lethalissimus" asked by L.Dutch
Anatomically Correct metalhead, part 1 - headbanging asked by Renan
Anatomically Correct metalhead, part 2 - physiology asked by Renan
Anatomically correct Pushmi-pullu from Dr. Dolittle asked by chasly from UK
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords asked by nullpointer
Anatomically Correct Pikachu asked by tox123
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves asked by A Lambent Eye
Anatomically Correct Vampire Teeth; Location, location, location asked by Artsoccer
Anatomically Correct Huldra asked by Pleiades
Anatomically Correct Carnivorous Tree asked by A Lambent Eye
Anatomically Correct Stranger Things Mindflayer's Monster asked by Logan R. Kearsley
Anatomically Correct Monsters, Incorporated asked by Logan R. Kearsley
Anatomically Correct Hunter from Needle asked by Logan R. Kearsley
Anatomically Modular Body Plan Animals asked by Logan R. Kearsley
Anatomically Correct Diegetic Singing Princess asked by Renan
Anatomically Correct Propellers asked by overlord
Anatomically Correct Jaculus asked by Blueblood
Anatomically Correct Diggy Diggy Dwarfs asked by Logan R. Kearsley
Anatomically Correct Triskelion asked by elemtilas
Anatomically Correct Sonic asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Yoshi asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Sphinx asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Catgirls asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Leviathan (Intelligent Design) asked by SE is too politically correct]
Anatomically Correct Kitsune asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Manticore asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Frieza asked by Pierre
Anatomically Correct Ammit asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Cockatrice asked by RotNDecay
Anatomically Correct Vanara asked by TGCF
Anatomically Correct Kemonomimis asked by Mindwin
Anatomically Correct Isitoq asked by SealBoi
Anatomically Correct Asari asked by Preg-Fan
Anatomically Correct Shrek asked by icewar1908
Anatomically Correct Super-Intelligent Shade of Blue asked by KeizerHarm
Anatomically correct bulborb asked by Dabantam
Anatomically Correct Giant Seahorses asked by Richard Lindahl
Anatomically Correct Glebsig asked by Galactic
Anatomically Correct Night Land Monsters asked by Logan R. Kearsley
Anatomically Correct Mummy asked by SquidKid999
Anatomically Correct Elves asked by ITM_Coder
Anatomically Correct Yeti asked by Rhymehouse
Anatomically Correct Buraq asked by Ichthys King
Anatomically Correct Mummy asked by SquidKid999
Anatomically Correct Mi-Go asked by Vogon Poet
-
2$\begingroup$ Have centaurs been made? $\endgroup$DaG– DaG2015年12月08日 22:37:08 +00:00Commented Dec 8, 2015 at 22:37
-
1$\begingroup$ Does Anatomically Correct Weebles count? $\endgroup$Damian Yerrick– Damian Yerrick2016年07月04日 18:10:41 +00:00Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 18:10
-
$\begingroup$ @DamianYerrick if the title was edited, yeah $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年07月04日 18:19:13 +00:00Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 18:19
-
$\begingroup$ These are not in order of newest to oldest; they are in order of oldest to newest, except for the first six, which are scrambled (the correct order is 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 6). You don't need to follow all the links; just remember that question numbers are assigned sequentially, so sorting by question number is equivalent to sorting chronologically. Also, #8 is a link to an answer. $\endgroup$Peregrine Rook– Peregrine Rook2016年07月28日 20:56:27 +00:00Commented Jul 28, 2016 at 20:56
-
$\begingroup$ Can we alphabetize this list so it's easier to use as a reference? $\endgroup$Nolo– Nolo2016年11月22日 17:53:34 +00:00Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 17:53
-
2$\begingroup$ @Nolo no, not because I don't want to (I don't) but also because that would mean complete re-editing every time a new one is asked and order of asking is good enough $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年11月22日 17:57:17 +00:00Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 17:57
-
$\begingroup$ @TrEs-2b Are you sure? :D I made a little program to make it easy if you change your mind. khanacademy.org/computer-programming/…. :) $\endgroup$Nolo– Nolo2016年11月22日 18:27:51 +00:00Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 18:27
-
$\begingroup$ @Nolo That link is good, I might do it when I get the time. $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年11月22日 18:34:40 +00:00Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 18:34
-
$\begingroup$ I'll make it friendlier so you can just paste and push the button. I put that link up here when I get home. $\endgroup$Nolo– Nolo2016年11月23日 00:49:23 +00:00Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 0:49
-
$\begingroup$ I kindof like having it in historical order. Maybe a second answer, alphabetized? It'd mean updating two answers each time, but it's not like that's a very frequent occurrence, and this metaquestion will already be being bumped. $\endgroup$Bobson– Bobson2016年11月23日 02:31:08 +00:00Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 2:31
-
$\begingroup$ @Bobson sounds like a good idea! I have to go offline for a while, but if you or Nolo want to do it, sounds great! $\endgroup$TrEs-2b– TrEs-2b2016年11月23日 02:57:03 +00:00Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 2:57
-
$\begingroup$ @Bobson Done and done. $\endgroup$Nolo– Nolo2016年11月23日 05:59:37 +00:00Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 5:59
-
$\begingroup$ @TrEs-2b Just for your own info, see my new answer below. Only I can edit the current program, i.e. keep it's record of the entries up to date, but anyone else can make a spin-off and have their own version if I drop off the face for any reason. Numbering can be pasted or ignored (it is cleaned from the entry text anyway when sorting). The answer does not disturb the linkages/enumeration in the original answer and the program also leaves those intact. So three step update, paste the links below, paste the entries to the program, sort, paste the list over the one below. $\endgroup$Nolo– Nolo2016年11月23日 06:07:26 +00:00Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 6:07
-
$\begingroup$ How do new entries get added? Because I made Anatomically correct mutliarmed humanoids just the other day. $\endgroup$MarqFJA87– MarqFJA872017年03月17日 12:45:01 +00:00Commented Mar 17, 2017 at 12:45
-
1$\begingroup$ Please just delete this entire series of close it $\endgroup$user75689– user756892020年05月30日 16:13:12 +00:00Commented May 30, 2020 at 16:13