Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true
• From: "Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme@...>
• Date: 2019年12月23日 17:29:29 -0300

---

On 2019年12月23日 4:42 p.m., Egor Skriptunoff wrote:

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:30 PM Soni "They/Them" L. wrote:
 if op == OP_TAILCALL then
    ...
    -- fallthrough
 orif op == OP_CALL then
    ...
 end
 because it looks nicer this way I guess.
The meaning of "orif" keyword is not intuitive-clear to a reader.

I would prefer to use explicit "goto" in case I need to implement fallthrough.

it's definitely more intuitive than switch-case fallthrough by a long shot.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true, Philippe Verdy

• References:
  • [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true, Soni "They/Them" L.
  • Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true, Egor Skriptunoff

• Prev by Date: Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true
• Next by Date: Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true
• Previous by thread: Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true
• Next by thread: Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread