Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• From: Philipp Janda <siffiejoe@...>
• Date: 2019年6月29日 23:52:19 +0200

---

Am 29.06.19 um 19:55 schröbte Roberto Ierusalimschy:

And then you realize that Lua may allocate memory during function *calls*
(e.g. growing the stack). I don't think this is covered in the current
<toclose> approach either.

I think it is.

How many stack slots do I have available when __close is called?

-- Roberto

Philipp

---

• References:
  • [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sean Conner
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sergey Kovalev
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), pocomane
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Philipp Janda
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Roberto Ierusalimschy

• Prev by Date: Re: dynasm vreg support
• Next by Date: Re: Non-linear lexical scoping (again) and an idea about __unset
• Previous by thread: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• Next by thread: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread