Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
• Date: 2019年6月28日 11:47:36 -0300

---

> Why we need extra functionality if it could be done with existing one?
> 
> [...]
> local f=auto(io.close){ io.open "foobar" } -- will be closed
It won't, if the table creation raises a memory error.
-- Roberto

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sergey Kovalev

• References:
  • [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sean Conner
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sergey Kovalev

• Prev by Date: Re: Refactor a block of Lua code to a function
• Next by Date: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• Previous by thread: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• Next by thread: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread