Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?
- From: Jeff <sysinit@...>
- Date: 2019年6月13日 07:15:53 +0200
03.06.2019, 13:43, "Rodrigo Azevedo" <rodrigoams@gmail.com>:
> Alternative, we can __band them:
> local & constant = 5
> local & catched = 10 -- alternative name, because all 'local' are
> lexically 'scoped' and 'toclose' is ugly.
why "&" ? it is already used for bitwise AND. what about "$" ?